"Autonomy is a towering concept in human affairs. Its "evocative force" pulses through the discourse of classical antiquity, rising in present times and proliferating across the globe. Vital to social-scientific and philosophical understanding, autonomy stands prominently in the pantheon of democratic values, celebrated together with the basic liberties, justice, equality, toleration, and the rule of law. Autonomy is a mainstay of individual freedom and the lifeblood of democratic conceptions of citizenship. Many believe that personal autonomy promotes individuality and authenticity, empowering citizens and spurring positive social change. Various scholars occupy themselves with the question of how to facilitate or to increase personal autonomy in democratic polities. Some ask what liberal government can do to advance personal autonomy, through schooling and other educational measures, in order to enhance people's pursuits or to energize political participation. Others go so far as to propose that personal autonomy is a basic human right, one generating moral and legal entitlements around the world. Numerous advocates have assumed that personal autonomy fits snugly with other important moral and political values. Some presuppose a natural compatibility between personal autonomy and superior ethical agency, reckoning that the more autonomous someone is, the better morally that person will be. Others intimate, or declare outright, that it is decidedly deficient not to be autonomous at the personal level. These views are fabricated from the positive qualities of autonomy, with proponents assuming, even defining, autonomous people as basically moral actors.The rosy notions and happy assumptions about autonomy are dangerous mistakes. Not only do many personally autonomous individuals take form as very bad actors: numerous of them are terrible miscreants who commit despicable, even monstrous acts. Some autonomous individuals torture, rape, and murder people they encounter. Others are deeply wicked and depraved in other ways. Personally autonomous individuals come in many dreadful varieties, from degenerate malefactors to perpetrators of horrific evil. The jumble includes those who unburden themselves of emotional and volitional constraints, preparing themselves for shocking acts. And the mix features individuals who labor thirstily to generate options to do evil, or who mull over depraved choices that appear within their perimeters. These are people whose autonomy produces a number of difficult philosophical and practical conundrums for moral and political theory, for liberalism, and for citizenship in democratic political orders. Many personally autonomous individuals are upstanding citizens and fine people, but there are legion who are not. Theorists of personal autonomy have done well to consider ways in which autonomous acts can be immoral, but virtually none has faced up to the reality that the category of personally autonomous agents includes highly unethical individuals, people who create a myriad of thoroughgoing, deeply challenging problems that destabilize personal autonomy's fit with crucial moral and political values.""--
Beruht die Entscheidung Gertraud Ladner ( Hg . ) zur Lebendspende wirklich auf Freiwilligkeit ? ... G. Ladner , A. Mlinar , W. der Lebendspende - Nierentransplantation Palaver , H. Renöckl , J. Römelt , H. beizutragen haben .
It is mainly a psychological approach (Alexa, Sandu, 2010). Constructionism places the formation ... is mainly a sociological approach. Constructionism abandons the idea according to which the individual mind is the mirror of reality.
Alfred Mele examines the concept of self-control on its terms, followed by an examination of its bearing on one's actions, beliefs, and emotions. He considers how, by understanding self-control, man can shed light on autonomous behaviour.
3–34. Manning, Gideon (2012), 'Three Biased Reminders about Hylomorphism in Early Modern Science and Philosophy', in G. Manning (ed.), Matter and Form in Early Modern Science and Philosophy, Leiden: Brill, pp. 1–32.
We further discover that even images have a transindividual origin and, even or especially, a transindividual nature, for Spinoza says that 'we shall call images' 'the affections of the human Body whose ideas present external bodies as ...
Using some of the works of Michel Foucault (1926-1984) as a conversation partner, Valerie Nicolet-Anderson focuses on the manner in which Paul constructs the identity of his audience in his letter to the Romans.
This book provides a clear understanding of patient autonomy and will prove essential reading for health care professionals, bioethicsts, and philosophers.
This book interrogates the philosophical and political consequences of such a dual definition of the subject, by exploring the processes of subjectivation and objectivation through which subjects are produced.