Karen Tracy examines the identity-work of judges and attorneys in state supreme courts as they debated the legality of existing marriage laws. Exchanges in state appellate courts are juxtaposed with the talk that occurred between citizens and elected officials in legislative hearings considering whether to revise state marriage laws. The book's analysis spans ten years, beginning with the U.S. Supreme Court's overturning of sodomy laws in 2003 and ending in 2013 when the U.S. Supreme Court declared the federal government's Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) unconstitutional, and it particularly focuses on how social change was accomplished through and reflected in these law-making and law-interpreting discourses. Focal materials are the eight cases about same-sex marriage and civil unions that were argued in state supreme courts between 2005 and 2009, and six of a larger number of hearings that occurred in state judicial committees considering bills regarding who should be able to marry. Tracy concludes with analysis of the 2011 Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing on DOMA, comparing it to the initial 1996 hearing and to the 2013 Supreme Court oral argument about it. The book shows that social change occurred as the public discourse that treated sexual orientation as a "lifestyle" was replaced with a public discourse of gays and lesbians as a legitimate category of citizen.
The chapters in this book, except for chapters 1 and 7, were originally published as a special issue of the journal Critical Discourse Studies. This volume comes with a new introduction.
In K. O'Riordan & D. J. Phillips (Eds.), Queer online: Media technology & sexuality (pp. vii–x). New York: Peter Lang. Hague, B.N., & Loader, B. (1999). Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age.
The essays in this volume analyze the rhetoric, strategies, and makeup of the LGBT social movement organizations pushing for same-sex marriage, and address the dire predictions of some LGBT commentators that same-sex marriage will spell the ...
Ultimately, The Battle over Marriage reveals both the promises and the limitations of commercial media as a route to social change.
Khalil, Ramy K. 255n.33, 256n.44 King, Martin Luther, Jr. 26 Kinsey, Alfred, 33–35, 58, 242, 253n.23, 253n.24 Kitchen v. ... Wade), 281n.6 McLanahan, Sara, 94–96, 175 Meezan, William, 275–76n.22 Melillo, Joseph, 92. See also Baehr v.
... Social Research, 78(2), 633–658. Stein, E. (2014). Immutability and innateness arguments about lesbian, gay, and bisexual rights. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 89(2), 597–640. Stewart, C. O. (2008). Social cognition and discourse ... change in the ...
By presenting scholarly research and activist observations on these questions, this volume helps translate queer critiques advanced during the marriage debates into a framework for ongoing critical research in the after-marriage period.
11 Lisa Duggan, “Beyond Formal Equality,” in “What's Next for the LGBT Movement?” Nation, June 27, 2013. 12 Urvashi Vaid, Virtual Equality: The Mainstreaming of Gay and Lesbian Liberation (New York: Doubleday, 1995), p. 2.
... and Janet Ainsworth From Truth to Technique at Trial: A Discursive History of Advocacy Advice Texts Philip Gaines Discourse, Identity, and Social Change in the Marriage Equality Debates Karen Tracy Translating the Social World for ...
As Jaye Cee Whitehead makes plain, debates over the definition and purpose of marriage indicate how thoroughly neo-liberalism has pervaded American culture.