The rule of law paradigm has long operated on the premise that independent judges disregard extralegal influences and impartially uphold the law. A political transformation several generations in the making, however, has imperiled this premise. Social science learning, the lessons of which have been widely internalized by court critics and the general public, has shown that judicial decision-making is subject to ideological and other extralegal influences. In recent decades, challenges to the assumptions underlying the rule of law paradigm have proliferated across a growing array of venues, as critics agitate for greater political control of judges and courts. With the future of the rule of law paradigm in jeopardy, this book proposes a new way of looking at how the role of the American judiciary should be conceptualized and regulated. This new, "legal culture paradigm" defends the need for an independent judiciary that is acculturated to take law seriously but is subject to political and other extralegal influences. The book argues that these extralegal influences cannot be eliminated but can be managed, by balancing the needs for judicial independence and accountability across competing perspectives, to the end of enabling judges to follow the "law" (less rigidly conceived), respect established legal process, and administer justice.
If public trust is now in decline, one part of the solution is to promote better understandings of how the judiciary actually works: how judges adhere to their oaths and how they try to avoid considerations of politics and popularity.
Reeling from Jem's mother's image of her as a “Dalilah” figure “lur[ing]” her son “to his danger” (221), Mary sets forth to prove her beloved suitor's innocence while keeping her father's guilt a secret. Portrayed as a solitary figure, ...
Rocket and her friends report to Antarctica's Affinity Station and continue their training to colonize Mars barely a month since the destruction of Pacifica, the seafloor research center, only to barrel headlong into relentless bad luck and ...
This new edition incorporates the Trump Presidency and the polarization that has accompanied his leadership.
In Who Is to Judge?, judicial politics expert Charles Gardner Geyh exposes and explains the overstatements of both sides in the judicial selection debate.
Eight Challenges to America's Future William E. Hudson. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, ...
The Politics of International Law J. Martin Rochester. 10. 11. For the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, see also Adam Roberts, “The Use of Force,” in The UN Security Council: From the Cold War to the 21st Century, ed. David M. Malone, 133–152 ...
But we should worry less about the illegal uses of personal data, James B. Rule argues, and worry a lot more about the perfectly legal uses of our data by the government and private industry, uses which are far more widespread and far more ...
America in Peril -- An Understatement!
This book considers how legislatures have undermined the presumption of innocence and how courts have largely accepted it.