As international criminal courts and tribunals have proliferated and international criminal law is increasingly seen as a key tool for bringing the world's worst perpetrators to account, the controversies surrounding the international trials of war criminals have grown. War crimes tribunals have to deal with accusations of victor's justice, bad prosecutorial policy and case management, and of jeopardizing fragile peace in post-conflict situations. In this exceptional book, one of the leading writers in the field of international criminal law explores these controversial issues in a manner that is accessible both to lawyers and to general readers. Professor William Schabas begins by considering the discipline of international criminal law, outlining the differing approaches to the description of international crimes and examining the frequent claims relating to the retroactive application of these crimes. The book then discusses the relationship between genocide and crimes against humanity, studying the fascination with what Schabas calls the 'genocide mystique'. International criminal tribunals have often been stigmatized as an exercise in victor's justice. This book traces how this critique developed and the difficulty it poses to the identification of situations for prosecution by the International Criminal Court. The claim that amnesty for international crimes is prohibited by international law is challenged, with a more nuanced approach to the relationship between justice and peace being proposed. Throughout the book there is a strong historical perspective, with constant reference to the early experiments in international justice at Nuremberg and Tokyo. The work also analyses the growing pains of the International Criminal Court as it enters its second decade.
The International Criminal Court ushered in a new era in the protection of human rights. The Court prosecutes genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression when...
This book contains the first-hand accounts of the challenges they faced, the obstacles they overcame, and the successes they achieved in obtaining justice for millions of victims.
This is an essential work for understanding judicial reckoning with mass atrocity in our time."--Michael R. Marrus, professor emeritus, University of Toronto "The Right Wrong Man is powerful, richly observed, and darkly entertaining.
... references the continuing prevalence of “unimaginable atrocities that deeply shock the conscience of humanity” as a primary reason why the ICC itself is needed, going so far as to directly equate atrocities with international crimes ...
Scrutinizing all the relevant case law of the International Criminal Court (ICC), this book elucidates the paradigm that the ICC's jurisprudence represents in international criminal justice.
No Ordinary Joes tells the harrowing story of four of the Grenadier’s crew: Bob Palmer of Medford, Oregon; Chuck Vervalin of Dundee, New York; Tim McCoy of Dallas, Texas; and Gordy Cox of Yakima, Washington.
104 E.g. H. Barnett, Introduction to Feminist Jurisprudence (Cavendish Publishing, 1998); K. Bartlett, 'Feminist Legal Methods' (1989) 103(4) Harvard Law Review 829; Charlesworth and Chinkin, see n. 5; J. Morgan and R. Graycar, ...
Robert Gerwarth weaves together little-known stories of Heydrich's private life with his deeds as head of the Nazi Reich Security Main Office.
13 In similar fashion, the title of Schabas' book is Unimaginable Atrocities. However, after mentioning the preamble of the ICC Statute, the book quickly moves on to the core crimes as they have been developed in international law.14 ...
UNIMAGINABLE ATROCITIES AND RELATED MATTERS THAT BILL HAS THOUGHT ABOUT A. The Scope of Unimaginable Atrocities I turn to some ruminations about Bill's thoughts, using Unimaginable Atrocities as my vehicle. In the introduction to it ...