An updated and expanded successor to Culver and Gert's Philosophy in Medicine, this book integrates moral philosophy with clinical medicine to present a comprehensive summary of the theory, concepts, and lines of reasoning underlying the field of bioethics. Rather than concentrating narrowly on bioethics and investigating moral philosophy only marginally, the authors provide an explicit account of common morality and show how it applies to and is modified by the realities of clinical medicine. Such broader knowledge finds its specific practical application when one attempts to resolve the more complex and difficult cases. This book does not attempt to settle all controversial matters, but rather provides an ethical framework that various parties to the dispute can accept and use as a basis for reaching agreement. Thus, the authors' main goal is to facilitate ethical discussion. Their detailed analyses of death and disease maintain the theoretical objectivity of these concepts while recognizing their central role in social and medical practices. They also provide in-depth discussions of the central concepts and issues in bioethics: competence, consent, justification for moral rule violations, and confidentiality. Paternalism, one of the most pervasive problems in clinical medicine, is accorded special attention. All these concepts have been integrated and systematically grounded within common morality. The book is richly illustrated with discussions of clinical cases. The authors explicitly compare their position with other accounts of bioethics such as principlism, casuistry, and virtue theory. Their discussion of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide clarifies and evaluates the recent legal decisions on these topics. The arguments throughout the volume stand out with characteristic clarity and cogency. A fresh and all-encompassing approach to bioethics that does not shy away from controversy, Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals will interest not only students in philosophy of medicine and medical ethics courses, but also moral philosophers and bioethicists, as well as doctors, nurses, and other health care professionals.
... Rhoda E. Howard , from “ Human Rights and the Necessity for Cultural Change , " Focus on Law Studies 336 NO : Vinay Lal , from " The Imperialism of Human Rights , ” Focus on Law Studies 340 Rhoda E. Howard , a Canadian sociologist ...
The proposal to establish what Chief Justice Richard J. Hughes called a hospital “ Ethics Committee ” gave a major impetus to a new Robert M. Veatch . “ Hospital Ethics Committees : Is There A Role ? ” Abridged from The Hasting Center ...
IBM, 306, 332 Bravery, 426 Braybrooke, David, 380 Breast implants, 204-06, 211, 221-22 Brennan, Troyen, 334, 381 Brett, Allan S., 218 Brewin, Thurstan B., 328 Briguglio, John, 108 Brock, Dan, 24, 53, 76, 106-7, 161-62, 164, 224, ...
... that the decision of Dr Todd can be rationally and responsibly supported ... whatever may have been his alternatives. ... in Walker-Smith v GMC146 the court recognised that the line between innovative treatment and experimental ...
Emanual (oncology and medical ethics, Harvard) rejects the argument that recent issues of medical ethics are the result of new technologies, and contends that they are an inevitable consequence of liberal political values.
menopause, creating the opportunity for safe, effective relief and treatment for women (Pearson, 2002; Mishra et al., 2010). There are myriad products on the market that claim to relieve the distressing symptoms of menopause.
New Scholasticism 54 (1980): 200–12; Gilbert Meilaender, “The Distinction between Killing and Allowing to Die,” Theological Studies 37 (1976): 467–70; Raanan Gillon, “Euthanasia, Withholding Life-Prolonging Treatment, ...
The Patient Self - Determination Act David B. Clarke 1. The federal Patient Self - Determination Act ( PSDA ) became effective on December 1 , 1991more than 15 years after California became the first state to pass its Natural Death Act ...
In terms of medicine and clinical ethics ( that deal with questions of what should be done regarding a specific patient , an individual ) , the object ... What is ( are ) the contextual scale ( s ) and what the constituent scale ( s ) ?
Translated by Joseph Ward Swain . London : George Allen & Unwin , 1950. New York : Free Press , 1965. Classic monograph purporting to show origins of religious systems reflected in those of Australian Aborigines .