Advice and Consent: The Politics of Judicial Appointments
- ISBN-10
- 0195300211
- ISBN-13
- 9780195300215
- Series
- Advice and Consent
- Category
- Law
- Pages
- 180
- Language
- English
- Published
- 2005-09-15
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press on Demand
- Authors
- Lee Epstein, Jeffrey A. Segal
Description
Discussing everything from constitutional background, to crucial differences in the nomination of judges and justices, to the role of the Judiciary Committee in vetting nominees, the author provides information that helps to understand the partisan rows that surround the judicial nominating process.
Get the book
Other editions
-
- 2005-09-15
- 192 pages
- Ebook
- Oxford University Press
-
- 2005-09-15
- 192 pages
- Paperback
- Oxford University Press
-
- 2001-03-05
- 327 pages
- Paperback
- Cambridge University Press
Similar books
-
The Advice and Consent of the Senate: A Study of the Confirmation of Appointments by the United States Senate
By Joseph Pratt HarrisThe Advice and Consent of the Senate: A Study of the Confirmation of Appointments by the United States Senate
-
Advise and Consent
By Allen Drury#1 New York Times bestseller and Pulitzer Prize winner.
-
The Advice and Consent of the Senate
By Joseph P. HarrisThe Advice and Consent of the Senate
-
Advice & Consent: Clarence Thomas, Robert Bork and the Intriguing History of the Supreme Court's Nomination Battles
By Paul SimonThe televised coverage of the Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill hearings raised the profile of the Supreme Court in America's collective consciousness, sensitizing the public to the Court's power and deficiencies. The...
-
Filling Advice and Consent Positions in a New Administration
By Emmanuel MorelThis book explores the history of the Senate's role in choosing members of the cabinet in a new presidential administration.
-
Supreme Court Appointment Process: Roles of the President, Judiciary Committee, and Senate
By Denis Steven RutkusOver more than two centuries, a recurring theme in the Supreme Court appointment process has been the assumed need for excellence in a nominee. However, politics also has played an important role in Supreme Court appointments.