Military intervention in a conflict without a reasonable prospect of success is unjustifiable, especially when it is done in the name of humanity. Couched in the debate on the responsibility to protect civilians from violence and drawing on traditional 'just war' principles, the central premise of this book is that humanitarian military intervention can be justified as a policy option only if decision makers can be reasonably sure that intervention will do more good than harm. This book asks, 'Have past humanitarian military interventions been successful?' It defines success as saving lives and sets out a methodology for estimating the number of lives saved by a particular military intervention. Analysis of 17 military operations in six conflict areas that were the defining cases of the 1990s-northern Iraq after the Gulf War, Somalia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Rwanda, Kosovo and East Timor-shows that the majority were successful by this measure. In every conflict studied, however, some military interventions succeeded while others failed, raising the question, 'Why have some past interventions been more successful than others?' This book argues that the central factors determining whether a humanitarian intervention succeeds are the objectives of the intervention and the military strategy employed by the intervening states. Four types of humanitarian military intervention are offered: helping to deliver emergency aid, protecting aid operations, saving the victims of violence and defeating the perpetrators of violence. The focus on strategy within these four types allows an exploration of the political and military dimensions of humanitarian intervention and highlights the advantages and disadvantages of each of the four types. Humanitarian military intervention is controversial. Scepticism is always in order about the need to use military force because the consequences can be so dire. Yet it has become equally controversial not to intervene when a governmentsubjects its citizens to massive violation of their basic human rights. This book recognizes the limits of humanitarian intervention but does not shy away from suggesting how military force can save lives in extreme circumstances.
Many friends and colleagues made valuable contributions , among them Dr. Herb Goldberg , Dr. Lew Yablonsky , Dr. Bruce Parsons , Dr. Steve Harrison , Dr. Vance Kondon , Dr. Seymour Faschbach , Haya and Inge Molter , Dr. Ernst Beier ...
Using real-life examples, neuroscience and the latest psychological studies to explain why we might be good at recognising bad behaviour but bad at taking action against it, Sanderson shows how we can all learn to speak out, intervene, ...
Why We Act draws on the latest developments in psychology and neuroscience to tackle an urgent question: Why do so many of us fail to intervene when we're needed--and what would it take to make us step up?A renowned psychologist who has ...
In an age of political upheaval and economic uncertainty Ricard's quiet and empathetic logic reveals the cultural importance of the contemporary kindness phenomenon.
Generosity Versus Altruism: Philanthropy and Charity in the US and UK
无私
Here, Martin Nowak examines the five basic laws of cooperation - 'Kin Selection', 'Direct Reciprocity', 'Indirect Reciprocity', 'Network Reciprocity' and 'Group Selection' - to explain some of the most fundamental mechanics beneath everyday ...
But as Harvard's celebrated evolutionary biologist Martin Nowak explains in this ground-breaking book, cooperation is central to the four-billion-year-old puzzle of life.
Taken into a family, the SNU begins to want more and more things. Then one night he has a terrible dream that the greed seed growing inside him leads to the death of his best friend.
Por primera vez, Lee Alan Dugatkin nos da a conocer en esta obra a los protagonistas del debate sobre el altruismo, los temas que abordaron y las pasiones que pusieron en juego, hasta explicar, con asombrosa claridad, la "regla de Hamilton" ...