How can we develop a global economic architecture which is efficient, morally acceptable, geographically inclusive, and sustainable over time? Leading thinkers in international business and ethics identify the pressing moral issues which global capitalism must answer.
"A damning denunciation of things as they are, and a platform for how we can do better."—Andrew Leonard, Salon Building on the international bestseller Globalization and Its Discontents, Joseph E. Stiglitz offers here an agenda of ...
The Nobel Prize-winning economist and leading critic of globalization offers a fresh new approach to the issue that explains how to restructure an unstable global financial system, how nations can grow economically without damaging the ...
The recent agreements between some high street banks and the financial services union UNIFI are a model of good practice; □ address the concern that offshored work may be carried out in conditions that do not satisfy core labour ...
This brilliantly original book dismantles the underlying assumptions that drive the decisions made by companies and governments throughout the world, to show that our shared narrative of the global economy is deeply flawed.
Rarely do we get such an insider's analysis of the major institutions of globalization as in this penetrating book. With a new foreword for this paperback edition.
This edition features a new afterword by the author, in which he counters recent writings by prominent journalist Thomas Friedman and the Nobel Laureate economist Paul Samuelson and argues that current anxieties about the economic ...
In this book a highly distinguished international economist scrupulously explains how globalization works as a concept and how it operates in reality.
Making Globalization Socially Sustainable
Has increased financial integration led to more or less poverty? How have the poor fared during various currency crises? Does food aid hurt or help the poor?
However, the increasingly legalistic process has raised the transaction costs of settling disputes (Busch and Reinhardt 2003)21—one factor that has contributed to the ongoing under-representation of LDCs in the process.