This is the first book in bioethics that explains how it is that you actually go about doing good bioethics. Bioethics has made a mistake about its methods, and this has led not only to too much theorizing, but also fragmentation within bioethics. The unhelpful disputes between those who think bioethics needs to be more philosophical, more sociological, more clinical, or more empirical, continue. While each of these claims will have some point, they obscure what should be common to all instances of bioethics. Moreover, they provide another phantom that can lead newcomers to bioethics down blind alleyways stalked by bristling sociologists and philosophers. The method common to all bioethics is bringing moral reason to bear upon ethical issues, and it is more accurate and productive to clarify what this involves than to stake out a methodological patch that shows why one discipline is the most important. This book develops an account of the nature of bioethics and then explains how a number of methodological spectres have obstructed bioethics becoming what it should. In the final part, it explains how moral reason can be brought to bear upon practical issues via an 'empirical, Socratic' approach.
In this influential book, outstanding scholars in medical ethics bring these many methods together in one place to be systematically described, critiqued, and challenged.
This book systematically reviews a variety of methods for addressing ethical problems in medicine, accounting for both their weaknesses and strengths.
This is the first book that explains how you actually go about doing good bioethics.
36 Scanlon, “Rawls on Justification,” 151. Although Scanlon largely agrees that this is a big problem for Rawls, he insists that WRE isn't completely vacuous since it does exclude some potential sources of justification, such as various ...
This book is a philosophically-oriented introduction to bioethics.
Although the series is published in English, its scope is international, and manuscripts are welcome from authors throughout the world. Advances in Bioethics is now available online at ScienceDirect full-text online of volumes 6 onwards.
Combining discussions of meta-ethical challenges, examples of different methodologies for integrating empirical and normative research, and reflection on the challenges of conducting and publishing such work, this book will both introduce ...
The proposal to establish what Chief Justice Richard J. Hughes called a hospital “ Ethics Committee ” gave a major impetus to a new Robert M. Veatch . “ Hospital Ethics Committees : Is There A Role ? ” Abridged from The Hasting Center ...
This book discusses a range of methodological issues for an interdisciplinary bioethics. How can bioethics be an enterprise that does not only isolate issues and moral reasons but also (re)contextualises them?
Current Legal Issues, like its sister volume Current Legal Problems, is based upon an annual colloquium held at University College London. Each year, leading scholars from around the world gather...