Why does the United States sometimes seek multilateral support for its military interventions? When does it instead sidestep international institutions and intervene unilaterally? In Coalitions of Convenience, a comprehensive study of US military interventions in the post-Cold War era, Sarah Kreps shows that contrary to conventional wisdom, even superpowers have strong incentives to intervene multilaterally: coalitions confer legitimacy and provide ways to share the costly burdens of war. Despite these advantages, multilateralism comes with costs: multilateral responses are often diplomatic battles of attrition in which reluctant allies hold out for side payments in exchange for their consent. A powerful state's willingness to work multilaterally, then, depends on its time horizons--how it values the future versus the present. States with long-term--those that do not face immediate threats--see multilateralism as a power-conserving strategy over time. States with shorter-term horizons will find the expediency of unilateralism more attractive. A systematic account of how multilateral coalitions function, Coalitions of Convenience also considers the broader effects of power on international institutions and what the rise of China may mean for international cooperation and conflict.
Mark Hulsether, Building a Protestant Left: Christianity and Crisis Magazine, 1941–1993 (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1999), 64–65. Ibid., 64; Dorrien, The Making of American Liberal Theology, 528. 77 David W. Moore, ...
Coalitions. of. Convenience. Similar to the composition, it is much more difficult to identify a coherent belief system for the until 2009 dominant advocacy coalition than for its challenger ...
... there were coalitions of convenience. hattersley argued that once the first World War was over in 1918, the lloyd George coalition became a coalition of convenience and no longer one of necessity, for the general election of 1918 ...
The Politics of Military Coalitions introduces newly collected data designed to answer these very questions, showing that coalitions - expensive to build but attractive from a military standpoint - are very often more (if sometimes less) ...
McInnis surveys the literature on coalition operations from the Napoleonic era to NATO's war in Afghanistan in order to ... 16Sarah E. Kreps, Coalitions of Convenience: United States Military Interventions after the Cold War (Oxford ...
Sarah B. Pralle takes an in-depth look at why some environmental conflicts expand to attract a lot of attention and participation, while others generate little interest or action.
Policy narratives and policy outcomes: An NPF examination of Oregon's ballot measure 97. Policy Studies Journal 46(4): 771–797. DOI:10.1111/psj.12263 McNeely, Connie L., ... Warped Narratives: Distortion in the Framing of Gun Policy.
Reconsidered”, pp804–836 4 W.E. Hall, 1917, International Law 7th ed., p10, quoted in P.H. Winfield, “The History of ... Churchill: An Unruly Life, London: I.B. Taurus, p145 6 The interventions identified were: The Gulf War 1990–1991, ...
A Multi-disciplinary Study of Coalitions and their Implications for Governance Hoolo 'Nyane, Motlamelle A Kapa ... They formed a coalition of convenience which ousted the long-serving Pakalitha Mosisili who had defected from the Lesotho ...
THE CAUTIOUS, TENTATIVE INDIA OF MARCH 1998 HAD, BY MAY 2004, BECOME A SELF-CONFIDENT, RESURGENT INDIA. ITS VOICE WAS BEING HEARD, AGAIN'. A Call to Honour: In Service of Emergent...