Worries about scientific objectivity seem never-ending. Social critics and philosophers of science have argued that invocations of objectivity are often little more than attempts to boost the status of a claim, while calls for value neutrality may be used to suppress otherwise valid dissenting positions. Objectivity is used sometimes to advance democratic agendas, at other times to block them; sometimes for increasing the growth of knowledge, at others to resist it. Sandra Harding is not ready to throw out objectivity quite yet. For all of its problems, she contends that objectivity is too powerful a concept simply to abandon. In Objectivity and Diversity, Harding calls for a science that is both more epistemically adequate and socially just, a science that would ask: How are the lives of the most economically and politically vulnerable groups affected by a particular piece of research? Do they have a say in whether and how the research is done? Should empirically reliable systems of indigenous knowledge count as "real science"? Ultimately, Harding argues for a shift from the ideal of a neutral, disinterested science to one that prizes fairness and responsibility.
This volume does not settle the question of culturally distinctive epistemologies, but teases out the various philosophical, sociological and political aspects of the issue so that the debate can continue with greater clarity.
12 Cited in Nader, Naked Science. 13 Two sources give a good introduction to the richness of this approach; see Selin, Encyclopedia of the History of Science; and the Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor. See also Hess, Science ...
“ Science , Colonialism , and Violence : A Luddite View . ... “ Francis Bacon , the First Philosopher of Modern Science : A Non - Western View . ... Camping with the Prince , and Other Tales of Science in Africa .
In this major contribution to the debate over the role gender plays in the scientific enterprise, Sandra Harding pursues that question, challenging the intellectual and social foundations of scientific thought.Harding provides the first ...
At its core, this is a book about fierce journalists who have pursued truth and transparency and sometimes been punished for it--not just by tyrannical governments but by journalistic institutions themselves.
Among the most important are Christine Di Stefano, "Dilemmas of Difference: Feminism, Modernity, and Postmodernism," in Nicholson, Feminism/ Postmodernism; jane Flax, "Postmodernism and Gender Relations in Feminist Theory," in Nicholson ...
This book will be of great interest to a broad range of scholars as it presents current thinking on a topic of fundamental concern across the disciplines in the humanities and social sciences. Contributors.
This is an important book precisely because there is none other quite like it."--Evelyn Fox Keller, author of Reflections on Gender and Science
Teaching general chemistry: A materials science companion. Washington, D.C.: American Chemical ... General, organic and biological chemistry: An integrated approach. ... Introductory chemistry: A guided inquiry. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Objectivity is a key concept both in how we talk about science in everyday life and in the philosophy of science.