In the twenty-first-century world of juvenile justice policy and practice, nearly everyone agrees that one of the most pressing issues facing the nation's juvenile courts is their proper response to delinquent youths with mental disorders. Recent research indicates that about two-thirds of adolescent offenders in juvenile justice facilities meet the criteria for one or more mental disorders. What are the obligations of our juvenile justice system, then, as the caretaker for delinquent youth with such disabilities? How do issues of adolescent development create special challenges in determining the court's proper response to delinquents with special mental health needs? Thomas Grisso considers these questions while offering new information to assist the juvenile justice system in its responses to the needs of our children. Double Jeopardy considers the newest data on the nature of youths' mental disorders—their relationships to delinquency, the values and limits of methods to treat them, and the common patterns of adolescent offending. That information is used to chart a rational course for fulfilling the juvenile justice system's duty—as a custodian of children in need of health care, as a legal system promoting fairness in youth adjudication, and as a protector of public safety—to respond to delinquent youths' mental disorders. Moreover, Double Jeopardy provides a scientific yet practical foundation for lawmakers, judges, attorneys, and mental health care professionals, as well as researchers who must fill the knowledge gaps that limit the juvenile justice system's abilities to meet youths' mental health needs.
It had been more than three years since Brenda Schaefer had disappeared, her car found abandoned along an interstate highway in Louisville, Kentucky. From that rainy night forward, attention had...
In Double Jeopardy, Daniel Poneman argues that the world needs an “all-of-the-above” energy policy, one that advances the goal of decarbonizing the environment through all available means—including nuclear power.
Handed a rotten case, a lawyer will risk his life to uncover the truth A young woman is abducted by six men, beaten, raped, and left for dead.
This volume provides an up-to-date, in-depth analysis of the Double Jeopardy Clause.
C himsamy made a show of turning his head to look back at his platoon. then back at Neave. “How many men do you have here. Sergeant Neave?” “What?” Neave said. startled by the question. “Two. three dozen. Why do you want to know?
Stone Barrington faces down danger on all sides in the latest thriller from perennial fan favorite Stuart Woods.
Mr. Feinstein looked embarrassed for him. "Sorry," Harry added and closed his briefcase. "Let's return to the office and I'll show you some other — " "Let's just go," Mrs. Feinstein remarked. She started toward the door, ...
In the first book-length book on the subject in over a quarter century, George C. Thomas III advances an integrated theory of double jeopardy law, a theory anchored in historical, doctrinal, and philosophical method.
The true story of Brenda Sue Schaefer describes attempts by prosecutors to overturn the double jeopardy clause when photos of her being murdered by her boyfriend are discovered a year after he had already been tried and found not guilty of ...
She and Atherton are going at each other like two cocks after the same hen.” Laura laughed. “Well, two dogs after the same bone. You get the idea. Since I got this from Atherton, he didn't quite phrase it like that, just complained that ...