Katz asserts that these perversions arise out of a cluster of logical difficulties related to multicriterial decision making. The discovery of these difficulties dates back to Condorcet's eighteenth-century exploration of voting rules, which marked the beginning of what we know today as social choice theory. Condorcet's voting cycles, Arrow's Theorem, Sen's Libertarian Paradox--every seeming perversity of the law turns out to be the counterpart of one of the many voting paradoxes that lie at the heart of social choice. Katz's lucid explanations and apt examples show why they resist any easy resolutions."--Pub. desc.
In this series of chapters on contract damages issues, Victor P. Goldberg provides a framework for analyzing the problems that arise when determining damages, and applies it to case law in both the USA and the UK.
Bush, in assailing dictatorship and terrorism, states: Some worry that it is somehow undiplomatic or impolite to speak ... In the end, it is not clear what the ideal type of a tyranny of virtue would look like anymore than it is clear ...
In Rights Gone Wrong, Richard Thompson Ford, author of the New York Times Notable Book The Race Card, argues that this is seldom the case.
Timely, incisive, and highly readable, this is a book for all citizens who believe that prompt access to justice is the backbone of democracy, and a precious right to be reclaimed.
I assume a defendant must have committed a moral wrong if an adequate justification for punishment is to. 1 This phenomenon has been noted by many legal philosophers. For example, see Leo Katz: Why the Law Is So Perverse (Chicago: ...
Rand documents and stages her own perverse fantasies with her Barbie dolls as a way to resist the “straight” world. From a Deleuzean perspective, Driscoll (2002, 97–100) discusses Barbie in terms of “becoming” a girl/woman, ...
Rosen, Sherwin. 1992. “The Market for Lawyers.” Journal of Law and Economics 35 (October): 215–46. Sabot, Richard, and John Wakeman-Lin. 1991. “Grade Inflation and Course Choice.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (Winter): 159–70.
This book addresses these issues. Featuring chapters by an unrivalled set of experts, it discusses all aspects of targeted killing, making it unmissable reading for anyone interested in the implications of this practice.
Rees, 185; Beard v. Banks, 95, 96–97, 109, 111–12; Bell v. Wolfish, 79, 92,275–76n.17; Boyce v. Anderson, 151–52, 171; Brill v. Flagler, 223; Brown v. Carpenter, 223–24; Bryan v. Walton, 155; Burchill v. Hermsmeyer, 7; Carter v.
The Academy and the Judiciary Richard A. Posner. and David L. Schwartz and Lee Petherbridge, “The Use of Legal Scholarship by the Federal Courts of Appeals: An Empirical Study,” 96 Cornell Law Review 1345 (2011).