Featured here are the following prizewinning essays in the 1990 and 1991 ASCAP Nathan Burkan Memorial Competition in copyright law: 19901st Prize: Lee D. Neumann, Columbia University School of Law, The Berne Convention and Droit de Suite Legislation in the United States.2nd Prize: Michael K. Davis-Hall, Harvard Law School, Copyright and the Design of Useful Articles: A Functional Analysis of 'Separability.'3rd Prize: Cynthia D. Mann, Harvard Law School, The Aesthetic Side of Life: The Applied Art/Industrial Design Dichotomy.4th Prize (tie): Jon Clark, University of Maine School of Law, Copyright Law and Work for Hire: A Critical History.4th Prize (tie): Ted K. Ringsred, William Mitchell College of Law, Is Anticompetitive Misuse a Defense to Copyright Infringement?Honorable Mention: Benjamin R. Seecof, University of California -- Hastings College of the Law, Scanning Into the Future of Copyrightable Images: Computer-Based Image Processing Poses a Present Threat.19911st Prize: Christine L. Chinni, Western New England College School of Law, Droit D'Auteur Versus the Economics of Copyright: Implications for American Law of Accession to the Berne Convention.2nd Prize: Jonathan Z. King, Harvard Law School, The Anatomy of a Jazz Recording: Copyrighting America's Classical Music.3rd Prize: Leslie J. Hagin, University of Texas at Austin School of Law, A Comparative Analysis of Laws Applied to Fashion Works: Renewing the Proposal for Folding Fashion Works Into the United States Copyright Statute.4th Prize: John Gastineau, Indiana University School of Law, Bent Fish: Issues of Ownership and Infringement in Digitally Processed Images.5thPrize: Montgomery Frankel, University of San Francisco School of Law, From Kroft to Shaw, and Beyond: The Shifting Test for Copyright Infringement in the Ninth Circuit.
See also Country Community Timberlake Village v. HMW Special Utility District of Harris, 438 S.W.3d 661 (Tex. Ct. App. 2014) (holding that a neighboring ...
After Justin Timberlake exposed Janet Jackson's pierced nipple on national television for 9/16ths of a second, the FCC received over 540,000 complaints.
Volume III: The Chesapeake and New England, 1660-1750 William E. Nelson ... Decision of Law, Surry County Ct. 1673/74, in Eliza Timberlake Davis ed., ...
E. Edwards v. California, 314 U.S. 160 (1941), 66 Edwards v. Housing Authority of City of ... Timberlake, 148 Ind. 38,46 N.E.339 (1897), 69,70 Graves v.
Fitzgerald, 4.08[B][2], 5.05[D] Fitzgerald v. ... Mastrapa-Font, 7.03[A][3] Fontaine, In re, 5.05[D] Fontenette v. ... Frost, 5.05[A] Formato v.
The sole remedy is avoidance, however; damages cannot be claimed under s. ... 17, it places a great deal of power in the hands of insurance companies to ...
Normally, a mate«s receipt would later be given up for a bill of lading, ... they necessarily prejudice the rights of those who deal in the goods ...
27 257 U.S. 184, 42 S. Ct. 72, 66 L. Ed. 189 (1921). ... 38 Argensinger, “Right to Strike”: Labor Organization and the New Deal in Baltimore, 78 MD . HIST .
704 Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017, s. 80. 705 Leith v. Gould [1986] 1 NZLR 760. It is not clear how a New Zealand court would deal with a case such ...
... to meet the reasonable expectations of claimants about how the corporation should deal with them, by, inter alia, ... 7 Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975, s.