Alasdair Cochrane introduces an entirely new theory of animal rights grounded in their interests as sentient beings. He then applies this theory to different and underexplored policy areas, such as genetic engineering, pet-keeping, indigenous hunting, and religious slaughter. In contrast to other proponents of animal rights, Cochrane claims that because most sentient animals are not autonomous agents, they have no intrinsic interest in liberty. As such, he argues that our obligations to animals lie in ending practices that cause their suffering and death and do not require the liberation of animals. Cochrane's "interest-based rights approach" weighs the interests of animals to determine which is sufficient to impose strict duties on humans. In so doing, Cochrane acknowledges that sentient animals have a clear and discernable right not to be made to suffer and not to be killed, but he argues that they do not have a prima facie right to liberty. Because most animals possess no interest in leading freely chosen lives, humans have no moral obligation to liberate them. Moving beyond theory to the practical aspects of applied ethics, this pragmatic volume provides much-needed perspective on the realities and responsibilities of the human-animal relationship.
Sometimes , as Betsy Todd illustrated , animal research gives the illusion of importance ; but even with the advantage of source credibility inherent in medical credentials , vivisection cannot hold up under close scrutiny .
Rollin offers a fully revised discussion of this white-hot debate over animal rights. Many of Rollin's concerns have taken center stage, and his proposed legislation to protect animals in experimentation has become federal law.
He puts the issue of animal rights in historical context, drawing parallels between animal rights activism and other social movements, including the anti-slavery movement in the nineteenth century and the gay-lesbian struggle today.
She tells the story of how she became an advocate and the many individual birds she has known and whose lives and deaths have deepened her commitment to seeking their freedom from suffering.
For the Birds: From Exploitation to Liberation : Essays on Chickens, Turkeys, and Other Domestic Fowl
Do animals have rights? If not, do we have duties towards them? If so, what duties? These are myariad other issues are discussed in this brilliantly argued book, published in association with the leading think-tank Demos.
Enimala libareśana
Η απελευθέρωση των ζώων
Beschrijving van het lijden van dieren bij dierexperimenten en in de bio-industrie, die leidt tot het op ethische gronden verwerpen van het gebruik van de dieren voor deze doeleinden
Lewis is agnostic about self - consciousness even in higher animals . Elephants , even in the wild , presumably have some form of selfconsciousness and so a " rudimentary " individuality . But for the most part he would limit ...