One philosophical approach to causation sees counterfactual dependence as the key to the explanation of causal facts: for example, events c (the cause) and e (the effect) both occur, but had c not occurred, e would not have occurred either. The counterfactual analysis of causation became a focus of philosophical debate after the 1973 publication of the late David Lewis's groundbreaking paper, "Causation," which argues against the previously accepted "regularity" analysis and in favor of what he called the "promising alternative" of the counterfactual analysis. Thirty years after Lewis's paper, this book brings together some of the most important recent work connecting—or, in some cases, disputing the connection between—counterfactuals and causation, including the complete version of Lewis's Whitehead lectures, "Causation as Influence," a major reworking of his original paper. Also included is a more recent essay by Lewis, "Void and Object," on causation by omission. Several of the essays first appeared in a special issue of the Journal of Philosophy, but most, including the unabridged version of "Causation as Influence," are published for the first time or in updated forms. Other topics considered include the "trumping" of one event over another in determining causation; de facto dependence; challenges to the transitivity of causation; the possibility that entities other than events are the fundamental causal relata; the distinction between dependence and production in accounts of causation; the distinction between causation and causal explanation; the context-dependence of causation; probabilistic analyses of causation; and a singularist theory of causation.
Twelve essays explore what bearing empirical findings might have on philosophical concerns about counterfactuals and causation, and how, in turn, work in philosophy might help clarify issues in empirical work on the relationships between ...
Collectively, they represent the state of the art on these topics. The essays in this volume are inspired by the life and work of Peter Menzies, who made a difference in the lives of students, colleagues, and friends.
In C. Gillett and B. Loewer, eds, Physicalism and Its Discontents. Cambridge: Cambridge University ... Robb, D. 1997. The Properties of Mental Causation. Philosophical Quarterly 47: 178–194. Robb, D. 2001. Reply to Noordhof on Mental ...
In 2015, Kearney and Levine sought to evaluate the longterm impacts of the program in a retrospective evaluation carried out in the United States. Taking advantage of limitations in television broadcasting technology in the early years ...
Stathis Psillos divides his account into three sections: causation, laws of nature, and explanation.
This book is about making machine learning models and their decisions interpretable.
The book is designed to be of value both to trained specialists and those coming to the problem of causation for the first time. It provides the reader with a broad and sophisticated view of the metaphysics of the causal relation.
1999; Heckman, Ichimura, Smith, and Todd 1998; Heckman, Ichimura, and Todd 1997, 1998 in economics and Ho, Imai, King, and Stuart 2007 and Diamond and Sekhon 2013 in political science). Given the growth of this literature, ...
P. French, T. Uehling, and H. Wettstein. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. Humphreys, P. 1989. ... Johnston, J. 1992. "Econometrics: Retrospect and Prospect." In The Future of Economics, ed. J. Hey. Oxford: Blackwell.
It shows us the essence of human thought and key to artificial intelligence. Anyone who wants to understand either needs The Book of Why.