Deterrence as a strategic concept evolved during the Cold War. During that period, deterrence strategy was aimed mainly at preventing aggression against the United States and its close allies by the hostile Communist power centers--the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) and its allies, Communist China and North Korea. In particular, the strategy was devised to prevent aggression involving nuclear attack by the USSR or China. Since the end of the Cold War, the risk of war among the major powers has subsided to the lowest point in modern history. Still, the changing nature of the threats to American and allied security interests has stimulated a considerable broadening of the deterrence concept. Post-Cold War Conflict Deterrence examines the meaning of deterrence in this new environment and identifies key elements of a post-Cold War deterrence strategy and the critical issues in devising such a strategy. It further examines the significance of these findings for the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps. Quantitative and qualitative measures to support judgments about the potential success or failure of deterrence are identified. Such measures will bear on the suitability of the naval forces to meet the deterrence objectives. The capabilities of U.S. naval forces that especially bear on the deterrence objectives also are examined. Finally, the book examines the utility of models, games, and simulations as decision aids in improving the naval forces' understanding of situations in which deterrence must be used and in improving the potential success of deterrence actions.
Questioning The Morality Of Nuclear Deterrence Charles Kegley ... In Charles W. Kegley, Jr., and Eugene R. Wi kopf, eds., The Nuclear Reader, 2d ed., pp. ... The Nuclear Seduction: Why the Arms Race Doesn't Matter—and What Does.
By looking at the concept of nuclear deterrence in more detail this essay will argue that nuclear deterrence must be seen as a conflict, even though arguments can be found underlining the view that it is not.
In this book, Vesna Danilovic provides a rigorous theoretical and empirical analysis of these conditions.
The Future's Back provides a valuable framework for organizing and evaluating research on superpower rivalry and nuclear deterrence.
In Military Persuasion, Stephen J. Cimbala reconciles two central approaches to war and peace studies. In the study of crisis management and war termination, the security literature overwhelmingly emphasizes the...
This book will be essential reading for students of politics and international relations as well as all those interested in contemporary strategic thought. As a concept, deterrence has launched a thousand books and articles.
This book analyzes the United States and Russia’s nuclear arms control and deterrence relationships and how these countries must lead current and prospective efforts to support future nuclear arms control and nonproliferation.
This open access volume surveys the state of the field to examine whether a fifth wave of deterrence theory is emerging.
This book examines six decades of RAND Corporation research on deterrence for lessons relevant to the current and future strategic environments.
The author reviews the history of nuclear deterrence and calls for a renewed intellectual effort to address the relevance of concepts such as first strike, escalation, extended deterrence, and other Cold War-era strategies in today's ...