A concise treatment of all issues relating to the use of electronic information in litigation today. Extensive treatment of questions of preservation, search for and production of electronically stored information, as well as the ethical issues faced by lawyers in managing all of this information. The book also discusses how electronic information can be produced in court and how the federal rules can be and have been adopted to accommodate digital evidence. The book has been written by the author of the landmark Zubulake opinions; the Reporter to the Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Evidence; and the Sedona Conference, which is at the forefront of thinking and writing on the problems of electronic discovery.
Featuring partners from some of the nations leading law firms, these experts guide the reader through the process of implementing an e-discovery strategy, as they discuss the importance of protecting electronic information, considering e ...
38 South Shropshire District Council v Amos [1986] 1 W.L.R. 1271; Schering Corporation v Cipla Ltd, The Times, December 2, 2004, Ch.D; Pearson Education Ltd v Prentice Hall India ...
Pearson,. 35. F.R.D.. 20. (D.D.C.. 1964). relevant evidence of defendants' policies). Roesberg v. Johns-Manville Corp., 85. 15 Cannata v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp., 2012 US. Dist. LEXIS 20625, at *10— *12(D. Nev. Feb. 17,2012).
Anton Piller Orders
Turn to this trusted guide for thorough, up-to-date clarification of: Insurance discoverability Discovery abuse -- its penalties and sanctions Confidentiality and discovery of trade secrets Use of experts Use of investigation files Use of ...
Fundamentals of Pretrial Litigation
Obtaining Discovery: Initiating and Responding to Discovery Procedures : Here's how and when to Do it
Obtaining Discovery: November 2014: Initiatinf and Responding to Discovery Procedures
5:9.10 FRAUD Generally. . . . . 1:8.18[9] Attorney-client privilege, exception to . . . . . 1:2.06[2]; 3:2.26[1][c] Burden of proof. . . . . 1:6.14[1] Complaint, requirement for particularity in pleading of fraud in Generally.
Civil Discovery