Buchanan and Tullock’s seminal work, The Calculus of Consent, linked economic methodology to substantive questions in political science. Among the major contributions of their book is a connection between constitutional decision making and contractarianism, a philosophical tradition that proponents believe can give institutions legitimacy. In other words, a major contribution of their book is a clear connection between empirical decision making and normative principles. The current book formalizes and extends their foundational ideas as it attempts to show how economic and philosophical arguments about the "best" voting rules can be used to improve constitutional design. It informs debates about constitutional political economy in comparative politics, democratic theory, and public choice. Political scientists often ask questions about what causes a nation to seek a new constitution, how constitutions are made, and what factors allow for corrupt decision making. The Calculus of Consent and Constitutional Design bridges the gap between normative questions about which institutions are most efficient and fair and empirical questions about how constitutions are formed. This provides a benchmark to help create better constitutions and informs empirical research about what institutions are most likely to succeed. The book begins by showing how contractarian ideals can be used to justify choices about decision-making. It then carefully defines several concepts employed by Buchanan and Tullock and shows why the relationships between these concepts may not be as closely linked as Buchanan and Tullock first thought. This provides a backdrop for analyzing the three phases of constitutional decision-making: 1) the constitutional phase, where rules for constitutional decision making must be justified; 2) the legislative phase, where the optimal k-majority rule is analyzed; and 3) the electoral phase, where the optimal voting rule for large electorates and open alternatives are determined. These phases differ by context and sources of legitimacy. Computational models and analytic techniques are introduced in each of these chapters. Finally, the book concludes with statements about the significance of the research for the creation of constitutions more broadly.
NOTES TO CHAPTER 3 Philip H. Wicksteed , The Common Sense of Political Economy ( London : Macmillan , 1910 ) , chap . V. 2 . There are , of course , exceptions . See Arthur Bentley , The Process of Government .
This book makes the case for an approach to constitutional political economy that is grounded in consistent, hard-nosed public choice analysis.
The Calculus of Consent, the second volume of Liberty Fund's The Selected Works of Gordon Tullock, is a reprint edition of the ground-breaking economic classic written by two of the...
Johnson reports that one of the major public finance professors of that early period, Henry C. Adams, who pursued graduate study in Germany, organized his teaching around two questions: (1) what are the legitimate and necessary wants of ...
This book is written for anyone, anywhere sitting down to write a constitution.
Appropriately interpreted, the working of social rules is also the central subject matter of modern political economy. This book is about rules - what they are, how they work, and how they can be properly analysed.
The book concludes with a discussion of some principal objections to the enterprise of contract theory, and offers its own programme for the future of that theory taking the form of the empirical method.
A. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe pravo: uchebnoje posobie [Comparative Constitutional Law: a Textbook]. Otv. red. V.E. Chirkin. ... Dougherty K. L., Edward J. The Calculus of Consent and Constitutional Design.—New York: Springer, 2011 ...
Gordon Tullock is among a small group of living legends in the field of political economics. The Selected Works of Gordon Tullock provides an entree to the mind of an original thinker.
An index to the series "The Collected works of James M. Buchanan."