Archbold: Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice
- ISBN-10
- 0421910003
- ISBN-13
- 9780421910003
- Series
- Archbold
- Category
- Criminal procedure
- Pages
- 656
- Language
- English
- Published
- 2006
- Authors
- P. J. Richardson, Sarah Campbell, D. A. Thomas
Description
Providing all the material needed when preparing for and during a trial, Archbold: Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice is the most frequently cited publication in the Crown Court. Covering both substantive law and practice and procedure, it goes through each type of offence in detail, chapter by chapter, and also deals with sentencing, costs and appeals. An eminent practitioner author team brings together expertise on every aspect of criminal law and practice to ensure unrivalled quality and attention to detail. Archbold 2006 has been fully revised and updated with recent important changes including new statutes, new cases, new SIs and new Practice Directions, and Archbold's unique supplementation service keeps users up-to-date with the latest developments. Act 2004; Drugs Act 2005; Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005; Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005; Criminal Procedure Rules 2005; Criminal Justice Act 2003 (Categories of Offences) Order 2004; Criminal Justice Act 2003 (Retrial for Serious Offences) Order 2005; Practice Direction (Criminal proceedings: Classification and allocation of business); Practice Direction (Criminal proceedings: Case management); Revised Code for Crown Prosecutors; Code of practice on disclosure; Attorney-General's guidelines on disclosure; Protocol on the Control and Management of Heavy Fraud and other Complex Criminal Cases; and new case law.
Get the book
Other editions
Similar books
-
Code de procédure pénale annoté
By Cathy Fortin, Québec, Karen BédardCode de procédure pénale annoté
-
Casenote Legal Briefs: Adaptable to Courses Utilizing Kamisar, LaFave, Israel, and King's Casebook on Modern Criminal Procedure. Criminal procedure
By Casenotes, Kamisar, La FaveFor over two decades, Casenote Legal Briefs have helped hundreds of thousands of students prepare for classes and exams year after year with unparalleled results.
-
LexisNexis Practice Guide: Florida criminal practice and procedure
By David M. Gersten, Kendall CoffeyLexisNexis Practice Guide: Florida criminal practice and procedure
-
Criminal Procedure for the Law Enforcement Officer
By John N. FerdicoThe Court upheld the legality of the search over defendant's objections : Since Rawls [ the cousin ) was a joint owner of the bag , he clearly had authority to consent to its search . The officers therefore found evidence against the ...
-
Hebrew and Mexican Procedural Law: Comparative Aspects
By Marcos David Katz HalpernHebrew and Mexican Procedural Law: Comparative Aspects
-
Criminal Litigation 2015-2016
By Martin Hannibal, Lisa MountfordGibson [1991] Crim LR 642 . . . 12.11 Feltham Justices, ex p. Rees [2001] 2 Cr App R (S) 1 . . . 21.16.1 Finley [1993] Crim LR 50 . . . Fig. 6.1 Flemming (1988) 86 Cr App R 32 . . . 6.6 Flynn [2008] 2 Cr App R 20 .
-
Criminal Litigation
By Martin Hannibal, Lisa Mountford14.2.2 Drummond [ 2002 ] 2 Cr App R 352 ... 15.7.1 Duggan and Chohan [ 2006 ] 1 Cr App R 3 ... 19.7.4 Gibson ( 1887 ] LR 18 QBD ... 18.3 Gilmore [ 2005 ] 2 Cr App R 21 ... 19.7.1 , 19.7.5 Gleeson [ 2004 ] 1 Cr App R 29 .
-
El derecho internacional y el derecho internacional de los derechos humanos aplicados al juicio oral: el rompimiento de un paradigma
By Blanca Esther Salvador MartínezEl derecho internacional y el derecho internacional de los derechos humanos aplicados al juicio oral: el rompimiento de un paradigma
-
The Annotated Ordinances of Hong Kong: 刑事訴訟程序條例(第221章). Criminal Procedure Ordinance (Cap 221)
By Hong Kong, Nisha Mohamed, Karen HodgesThe Annotated Ordinances of Hong Kong: 刑事訴訟程序條例(第221章). Criminal Procedure Ordinance (Cap 221)
-
Understanding Criminal Procedure: Investigation
By Joshua Dressler, Alan C. Michaels15 Alan M. Dershowitz, The Best Defense xxi (1982) (stating that two rules of “the justice game” are: (1) “[a]lmost all criminal defendants are in fact guilty”; and (2) “[a]ll defense lawyers, prosecutors and judges understand and ...