This is the first anthology of Oliver Wendell Holmes's writings, speeches, and opinions concerning freedom of expression. Prepared by a noted free speech scholar, the book contains eight original essays designed to situate Holmes's works in historical and biographical context. The volume is enriched by extensive commentaries concerning its many entries, which consist of letters, speeches, book excerpts, articles, state court opinions, and U.S. Supreme Court opinions.
"This is the first anthology of Oliver Wendell Holmes's writings, speeches, and opinions concerning freedom of expression"--Provided by publisher
Healy, Great Dissent, 88–91; Debs v. United States (1919). Commonwealth v. Davis, 162 Mass. 510 (1894); McAuliffe v. Mayor and Board of Aldermen of New Bedford, 155 Mass. 216 (1892). Burt v. Advertiser Newspaper Company, 154 Mass.
510 See William A. Lundquist, Oliver Wendell Holmes and External Standards of Criminal and Tort Liability: Application of ... widows, and orphans, (c) Jews in dealings with Christians, and (d) sailors, merchants, and other travelers.
Based on newly discovered letters and memos, this riveting scholarly history of the conservative justice who became a free-speech advocate and established the modern understanding of the First Amendment reconstructs his journey from free ...
It is the story of a remarkable behind-the-scenes campaign by a group of progressives to bring a legal icon around to their way of thinking—and a deeply touching human narrative of an old man saved from loneliness and despair by a few ...
This extraordinary freedom results not from America’s culture of tolerance, but from fourteen words in the constitution: the free expression clauses of the First Amendment.InFreedom for the Thought That We Hate, two-time Pulitzer Prize ...
The voluminous literature devoted to his writings and legal thought, however, is diverse and inconsistent. In this study, Frederic R. Kellogg follows Holmes's intellectual path from his early writings through his judicial career.
The last section discusses some of the fundamental twentieth-century ideas they are associated with. This is a book about a way of thinking that changed American life.
" In Law without Values, Albert W. Alschuler paints a much darker picture of Justice Holmes as a distasteful man who, among other things, espoused Social Darwinism, favored eugenics, and as he himself acknowledged, came "devilish near to ...
Rankin v. McPherson (1987) A few years later, the Supreme Court determined in Rankin v. McPherson that a clerical employee in a Texas constable's office spoke on a matter of public concern when she told her boyfriend in a private ...