Americans have long been suspicious of experts and elites. This new history explains why so many have believed that science has the power to corrupt American culture. Americans today are often skeptical of scientific authority. Many conservatives dismiss climate change and Darwinism as liberal fictions, arguing that “tenured radicals” have coopted the sciences and other disciplines. Some progressives, especially in the universities, worry that science’s celebration of objectivity and neutrality masks its attachment to Eurocentric and patriarchal values. As we grapple with the implications of climate change and revolutions in fields from biotechnology to robotics to computing, it is crucial to understand how scientific authority functions—and where it has run up against political and cultural barriers. Science under Fire reconstructs a century of battles over the cultural implications of science in the United States. Andrew Jewett reveals a persistent current of criticism which maintains that scientists have injected faulty social philosophies into the nation’s bloodstream under the cover of neutrality. This charge of corruption has taken many forms and appeared among critics with a wide range of social, political, and theological views, but common to all is the argument that an ideologically compromised science has produced an array of social ills. Jewett shows that this suspicion of science has been a major force in American politics and culture by tracking its development, varied expressions, and potent consequences since the 1920s. Looking at today’s battles over science, Jewett argues that citizens and leaders must steer a course between, on the one hand, the naïve image of science as a pristine, value-neutral form of knowledge, and, on the other, the assumption that scientists’ claims are merely ideologies masquerading as truths.
hammer . If any one of these parts is removed , the mousetrap no longer traps mice . According to Behe , this means that an undirected , gradual process such as natural selection could not produce such a mousetrap .
In Earth Under Fire, Paul LaViolette investigates the connection between ancient world catastrophe myths and modern scientific evidence of a galactic destruction cycle, demonstrating how past civilizations accurately recorded the causes of ...
bite marks. In State ofArizona v. Bobby Lee Tankersley, Tankersley was being tried for the murder of sixty-five-year-old Thelma Younkin, who had been strangled in her Yuma, Arizona, motel room. The thirty-nine-year-old ...
Harry Dresden is the only consulting wizard in the Chicago phone book, and you know the case is bad if the cops have to call on him.
Here are the dramatic stories of the fall of Bataan, the siege of “the Rock,” and the daily struggles to tend the sick, wounded, and dying during some of the heaviest bombardments of World War II. Here also is the desperate war doctors ...
The unforgettable story of Rose Justice is forged from heart-wrenching courage, resolve, and the slim, bright chance of survival.
27 Sheila Watt-Cloutier, former chair of the Inuit Circumpolar Conference, sees incalculable harm from changes that may completely disrupt the society and subsistence life of the north. During her term of office, from 2002 to 2006, ...
This book surveys a wide range of such cases, and considers how these achievements were possible and how adversity helped shape the ideas that emerged from these conditions.
This book examines these challenges, while also exploring possible solutions (such as the formation of a forensic science consortium to address specific legislative issues). It is a must-read for all forensic scientists.
Excerpt from Science in Fire-Fighting The purpose of this work is to furnish the student fireman with a text-book in which the character and arrangement of the subject matter shall be such as to fulfill the following requirements: (1) ...