"Ask most Americans, and they'll tell you that presidential campaigns get dirtier and more negative with every election. But Emmett Buell and Lee Sigelman suggest that may not be as true as we think. From Jimmy Carter's use of "fear arousal" in attacking Ronald Reagan to George H. W. Bush's allusions to the "L word" to disparage Michael Dukakis's liberalism, Buell and Sigelman show how, over the last dozen elections, negativity may have been well publicized but hasn't increased and that John Kennedy waged the most negative campaign of all." "Buell and Sigelman focus on both presidential and vice-presidential nominees as sources and targets of attacks and also examine the actions of surrogate campaigners like the Swift Boat Vets. Drawing on the New York Times as a research base - more than 17,000 campaign statements extracted from nearly 11,000 news items - they provide a more comprehensive assessment of negativity than anything previously attempted." "Beginning in 1960, Buell and Sigelman categorize campaigns according to their level of competitiveness - from runaways like 1964 to dead heats like 2000 and 2004 - to demonstrate how candidates go negative as circumstances warrant or permit. They break down negativity into different components, showing who attacked whom, how frequently, on what issues, how they did it, and at what point in the campaign. They also compare their findings with previously published accounts of these campaigns - including firsthand accounts by candidates and their confidants. And, as an added bonus, each chapter features "echoes from the campaign trail" that reflect the invective exchanged by rival campaigns." "Attack Politics pins down much about negative campaigning that has previously been speculated on but never subjected to such systematic research. It offers the best overview yet of modern presidential races and is must reading for anyone interested in the vagaries of those campaigns."--BOOK JACKET.
A study of the consequences of partisan communication on the stability of unified government of the United States.
According to scholars writing about autonomist tendencies in social movements, “autonomy has become ... a central figure in the articulation of social movements” (Feigenbaum, Frenzel, and McCurdy 2013, 23) and, in this manner, ...
This unique volume presents for the first time work examining negative campaigning in the US, Europe and beyond.
Looks at the relationship between politicians and the new media and argues that politicians have turned the American public against the news media.
This work is a quality analysis of the problems posed by Political Action Committees in American life.
Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns John G. Geer. Karabell, Zachary. 2000. The Last Campaign. New York: Vintage. Keeter, Scott and Michael Delli Carpini. 1996. WhatAmericans Know About Politics and Why It Matters.
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER In this explosive new book, New York Times bestselling author and president of Judicial Watch Tom Fitton explains how the Radical Left and the Deep State are trying to destroy the Trump presidency.
Finally, the book includes perspectives from both the right and the left on the legitimacy of these attacks and the victims' defenses as well as their impact on American politics and policy.
Special Prosecutor Cox subpoenaed the recordings. Nixon wouldn't hand them over, citing executive privilege. Nixon then ordered Cox to drop his subpoena request, but Cox refused. On 20 October 1973, in what has since been deemed the ...
A revision of our best selling supplement for American Government focusing on the events and aftermath of the 9/11 attacks on American Politics and Government, this second edition focuses on political and policy fallout from the attacks.