Papers on Presidential Disability and the Twenty-Fifth Amendment describes the formation, efforts, and conclusions of the Miller Center Commission on Presidential Disability and the Twenty-Fifth Amendment--the fourth national commission organized by the Center that advances the ideas on the national improvement of the presidency. Orginally, the group met to advise the Center on the necessity and feasibility of a study of presidential disability, and Commission participants were primarily physicians whose expertise were in medical questions and medical issues. As the study progressed, however, the Commission expanded to include legislators, social scientists, and policy makers who explored a wide range of issues and problems. The book is divided into four sections and an appendix. The first section details the formation of the commission, the preliminary meetings in Washington, D.C., and the subsequent proposals for the study. The second section provides an overview of the role of the presidential physician and describes the burden of conflicting loyalties--to the patient and to the country--he must face. The definition and determination of 'inability to serve' is also debated by both medical and political experts. Related to this discussion is the use of medications and treatments that may impair presidential decision-making abilities. The third section is a series of interviews and correspondence with prominent medical, legal, and political authorities. Topics discussed include: the coordination of law enforcement and national defense in the event of an attack on the president, changes in legal arrangements, the role of Congress during presidential disability, procedures for military command succession, and competing interpretations and reports are provided in the fourth section. They serve as examples of the analyses that took place prior to the formation of the Commission. Included in this section is a memorandum that foretells the differences in thinking between the original medical group that began the Commission and the diverse group as it was eventually comprised. The book concludes with several appendices. They include transfer agreements written in different administrations and an excerpt from Barbara Bush's biography that describes a discussion of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment during the Bush administration.
本书对美国无论是公营部门还是私营公司十分严重的官僚主义现象,开出了十种“药方”,而作者提出最主要的办法就是用“企业家精神”来克服官僚主义,即政府要讲究实效,按效 ...
Joyce Seltzer , my editor , and other members of the Free Press staff performed superhuman labors to publish the manuscript in rapid ... John J. Mearsheimer , Sam C. Sarkesian , David R. Segal , John Alden Williams , and Frank R. Wood .
... Jr. Resident Scholar Randall Lutter Resident Scholar John H. Makin Resident Scholar ; Director , Fiscal Policy Studies Allan H. Meltzer Visiting Scholar Joshua Muravchik Resident Scholar Charles Murray Bradley Fellow Michael Novak ...
The Benefits or Costs of EU Membership Brian Hindley & Martin Howe Occasional Paper 99 ( new edition ) ; ISBN 0 255 36502 0 £ 10.00 Buckingham at 25 Freeing the Universities from State Control Edited by James Tooley Readings 55 ; ISBN 0 ...
This study is a short-term effort examining alternative ways that government can carry out its activities.
This bibliography, first published in 1957, provides citations to North American academic literature on Europe, Central Europe, the Balkans, the Baltic States and the former Soviet Union. Organised by discipline,...
Since 1937 , and especially since 1954 , as a result of the Warren Court's active defense of individual liberties , liberals insist that in Supreme Court rachels CHAPTER 19 The Judges 465 protecting fundamental constitutional guarantees ...
Comments and suggestions were provided by Konstantin Atanesyan , Ani Balabanyan , David Davtian , Mohammad Reza Ghasimi , Karen Grigorian , Susanna Hayrapetyan , Artak Kyurumyan , Heath McDonald , Naira Melkumyan , Gayane Minasyan ...
美国房产协会(始于20 世纪20年代)与像莱维特这类在意识形态上反共的开发商一起,鼓励在使用非工会劳动力的工厂里生产预制装配式房屋。这对建筑行业中的工会极为不利。与此同时,低成本房屋的产量不断增大,顺应了日益增长的需求。
广泛参与——网络问责的基础某一事件虽然被网络曝光,但如果没有得到足够的跟帖、BBS、博客、微博讨论,那就意味着公众对这件事缺乏足够的兴趣,这件事也就很容易石 沉大海,而不能产生足够的问责力量。换言之,网络问责必须靠人多势众来制造影响力,获得社会公众 ...