Has global liberalism made the nation-state obsolete? Or, on the contrary, are primordial nationalist hatreds overwhelming cosmopolitanism? To assert either theme without serious qualification, according to Ernst B. Haas, is historically simplistic and morally misleading. Haas describes nationalism as a key component of modernity and a crucial instrument for making sense of impersonal, rapidly changing, and heterogeneous societies. He characterizes nationalism as a feeling of collective identity, a mutual understanding experienced among people who may never meet but who are persuaded that they belong to a community of kindred spirits. Without nationalism, there could be no large integrated state.Nationalism comes in many varieties, some revolutionary in rejecting the past and some syncretist in seeking to retain religious traditions. Haas asks whether liberal nationalism is particularly successful as a rationalizing agent, noting that liberalism is usually associated with collective learning and that liberal-secular nationalism delivers substantial material benefits to mass populations. He also asks whether liberal nationalism can lead to its own transcendence. He explores nationalism in five societies that had achieved the status of nation-states by about 1880: the United States, Britain, France, Germany, and Japan.Several of these nation-states became exemplars for later nationalists. A second, forthcoming volume will consider ten societies that modernized more recently, many of them aroused to nationalism by the imperialism of these "old" nation-states.
Eindić, “Ko je suveren u Jugoslaviji?,” in Jugoslavija, 111–27. Bindić, “Parlament i reprezentacija,” in Jugoslavija, 91–109. Bindić, “Ko je Čuvar ustava?,” in Jugoslavija, 129–53. Bindić, “Demokratija kao uspostavljena saglasnost?
Applying a framework derived from comparative politics and IR theory, the authors of this text explore two sets of empirical cases: the emergence of new nationalisms in old European democracies and the re-emergence of old nationalisms in ...
These essays arose out of lectures given in Oxford to commemorate the 150th anniversary of the 1848 revolutions in Europe. They comprise summaries of the existing state of knowledge, new insights and unfamiliar information.
Malešević shows how the recent escalation of populist nationalism is not an anomaly, but the result of globalisation and nationalism developing together through modern history.
In that context, nationalism is bound to assume even more importance than heretofore...This is an admirably ambitious and well-organized book, combining careful exegesis with wide-ranging ideas.
This book explores the complex relationship between nationalism and liberal thought in the Arab East during the first half of the twentieth century.
Are youth uniformly more supportive of change than the rest of the population? To what extent are changes in values connected to changes in identities? How do we explain the process of change in the long term?
Emanuel Adler is one of the leading IR theorists of his generation. This volume brings together a collection of his articles, including four new and previously unpublished chapters.
... Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice ( Ithaca , NY : Cornell University Press , 1989 ) , chaps . ... 1 ; Samuel S. Kim , " Global Human Rights and World Order , " in Richard A. Falk , Samuel S. Kim , and Saul H. Mendlovitz ...
See Ernest Gellner, Nations and Nationalism (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983). 24. See Ernst Haas, Nationalism, Liberalism, and Progress: The Rise and Decline of Nationalism, Volume 1 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, ...