The unanimity and radicalism of South Carolina politics -- culminating in the events of 1860, when it became the first state to secede from the Union -- have long been a subject of interest and controversy. How do we explain the peculiar absence in South Carolina of the open debate and interest-group jockeying that characterized politics in other state legislatures? How did this unique brand of politics originate? Why did it develop in South Carolina and not in the other American colonies?
In A School for Politics Rebecca Starr explores how South Carolina's latent impulse for radicalism was already in place by 1800, an outgrowth of its experience with British imperial politics in the late colonial period. As a producer of vital raw materials--particularly rice, indigo, and hemp--South Carolina was one of Britain's most valuable American colonies. Her lobbyists in Parliament therefore got a closer hearing than, for example, those of Virginia or New York. At the same time, the colony's booming export economy gave rise to a vigorous native merchant community; as junior partners in the Carolina lobby, these merchants and commercial planters learned the skills of aggressive lobbying from their more experienced British counterparts.
This lobbying tradition taught lessons that enabled South Carolina's leaders to maintain social stability in a period that put more "democratic"states in disarray. Taking a hard line with outside powers, they had learned, fostered domestic unity and forced concessions from opponents. Brinkmanship politics kept South Carolina's elite in power. But in the face of growing challenges from a backcountry majority, entrenched leaders found themselvesincreasingly called upon to justify their right to leadership. In moments of crisis, therefore, they had to prove themselves heedless of their private interest -- and often did so by acts that now appear reckless.
Booth, John. 1985. The End and the Beginning: The Nicaraguan Revolution. Boulder: Westview. Booth, John, and Thomas W. Walker. 1989. Understanding Central America. Boulder: Westview Borge, Tomás. 1984. Carlos, the Dawn Ls No Longer ...
Examining selected societies in Africa, Asia, Europe and the Americas, this uniquely designed history discusses political and economic issues; marriage practices, motherhood, and enslavement; religious beliefs and spiritual development.
我们选择刘宋政权的建立来了解一下这一程序及其政治传播功能。宋的建立者刘裕,本是东晋北府兵的一名将领,东晋后期权臣桓玄反叛,废晋安帝自立,刘裕站在东晋王朝一边,率兵攻灭桓玄,恢复了东晋王朝,使安帝得以复位。
Vinny DeMarco might be a latter-day Don Quixote except that he tilts his lance at real obstacles to social justice: lobby-locked state legislatures and Congress, stonewalling the public will. And...
Election years pose a unique opportunity and challenge to nonprofit organizations and community groups as they struggle to advance their issues in a crowded news environment, and amplify the voices...
"For years, political scientists have told their students that it doesn't make a difference whether they vote because one vote won't make a difference. This book is antidote to that...
The myth of generations of disengaged youth has been shattered by increases in youth turnout in the 2004, 2006, and 2008 primaries. Young Americans are responsive to effective outreach efforts,...
The Road to Democracy project is a chronological analysis of four decades - 1960-1970, 1970-1980, 1980-1990, 1990-1994, bearing in mind the four areas of focus above and the following themes...
Political parties and interest groups have been important to understanding who gets what in American politics for many years. The traditional view was that political parties were concerned with winning...
While interest groups have long been at the center of the study of American politics, most explorations of their influence have tended to dwell on lobbying. When political scientists do...