How close did Germany come to winning World War II? Did Hitler throw away victory in Europe after his troops had crushed the Soviet field armies defending Moscow by August 1941? R. H. S. Stolfi offers a dramatic new picture of Hitler's conduct in World War II and a fundamental reinterpretation of the course of the war. Adolf Hitler generally is thought to have been driven by a blitzkrieg mentality in the years 1939 to 1941. In fact, Stolfi argues, he had no such outlook on the war. From the day Britain and France declared war, Hitler reacted with a profoundly conservative cast of mind and pursued a circumscribed strategy, pushing out siege lines set around Germany by the Allies. Interpreting Hitler as a siege Fuhrer explains his apparent aberrations in connection with Dunkirk, his fixation on the seizure of Leningrad, and his fateful decision in the summer of 1941 to deflect Army Group Center into the Ukraine when both Moscow and victory in World War II were within its reach. Unaware of Hitler's siege orientation, the German Army planned blitz campaigns. Through daring operational concepts and bold tactics, the army won victories over several Allied powers in World War II, and these led to the great campaign against the Soviet Union in the summer of 1941. Stolfi postulates that in August 1941, German Army Group Center had the strength both to destroy the Red field armies defending the Soviet capital and to advance to Moscow and beyond. The defeat of the Soviet Union would have assured victory in World War II. Nevertheless, Hitler ordered the army group south to secure the resources of the Ukraine against a potential siege. And a virtually assured German victory slipped away. Thisradical reinterpretation of Hitler and the capabilities of the German Army leads to a reevaluation of World War II, in which the lesson to be learned is not how the Allies won the war, but how close the Germans came to a quick and decisive victory--long before the United States was drawn into the battle.
The essay on Tobruk demonstrates how all three defining elements of wartime experience converged: the loss of public confidence about how the war was being conducted; its impact on the relationship with the Union of South Africa, a key ...
The Role of Intelligence in Soviet Military Strategy in World War II
Although there had been much talk in the Union camps and in Washington of the need to hold Pemberton's forces in place lest they reinforce Vicksburg, those forces had absolutely no bearing on the success or failure of 1013 See Fisk to ...
隆礼至法: 荀子谋略纵横
The sale of surplus infantry weapons to England in June of 1940 was the modest prelude to the “ destroyer deal ” of September 1940. The Battle of the Atlantic had claimed many British escort vessels , and the Royal Navy was desperately ...
From Sun Tzu to Hyperwar: A Strategic Encyclopaedia
With worldwide focus on the strategies used to win the Gulf War, here is a guide to ancient Oriental stratagems and their relevance today.
“Russians at War: Putin's Aggression Has Turned a Nation Against Itself. ... “Putin's Pyrrhic Victory: Russia's Setbacks in Eastern Ukraine Show Why It Can't Win the Wider War. ... Ukraine's Revolt, Russia's Revenge.
Perfil filosófico de la estrategia (teoría pura): dialéctica del pensamiento estratégico
The author examines the principal characteristics and ideas associated with the American way of war, past and present.