Established in 1964, the federal Legal Services Program (later, Corporation) served a vast group of Americans desperately in need of legal counsel: the poor. In Rationing Justice, Kris Shepard looks at this pioneering program's effect on the Deep South, as the poor made tangible gains in cases involving federal, state, and local social programs, low-income housing, consumer rights, domestic relations, and civil rights. While poverty lawyers, Shepard reveals, did not by themselves create a legal revolution in the South, they did force southern politicians, policy makers, businessmen, and law enforcement officials to recognize that they could not ignore the legal rights of low-income citizens. Having survived for four decades, America's legal services program has adapted to ever-changing political realities, including slashed budgets and severe restrictions on poverty law practice adopted by the Republican-led Congress of the mid-1990s. With its account of the relationship between poverty lawyers and their clients, and their interaction with legal, political, and social structures, Rationing Justice speaks poignantly to the possibility of justice for all in America.
The Rationing of Justice: Constitutional Rights and the Criminal Process
Rationing Justice on Appeal: The Problems of the U.S. Courts of Appeals
The Rationing of Justice
Rationing Health Care in America: Perceptions and Principles of Justice
Gore from Its Hall of Mirrors,” 115 Harv. L. Rev. 170,288 (2001); J. Harvie Wilkinson III, Cosmic Constitutional Theory (2012), 4; United States v. Windsor, 133 S. Ct. 2675, 2698 (2013) (Scalia,J., dissenting); Shelby County v.
With Justice for All ?: The Ethics of Healthcare Rationing
But then new social facts, such as new medical technologies that are costly and marginally beneficial, may disrupt what had been easy and obvious applications of one of these widely shared ethical judgments.