An appraisal of the adversary legal system in the U.S. by a former federal judge now practicing law, who finds the adversary process not truly adversary but seeking partisan justice rather than truth.
This book examines the evolution of the new rough-and-tumble politics of judicial elections by focusing on Texas, a bellwether for the new judicial selection politics in America.
The importance of the questions addressed, the breadth of the data collected, and the unorthodox conclusions offered make this a significant book for political scientists, judges, lawyers, and public officials.
Follows Rehnquist's career as a young lawyer in Arizona through his journey to Washington though the Warren and Burger courts to his twenty-year tenure as a Supreme Court Chief Justice who favored government power over individual rights.
FEC, and Shelby County v. Holder. This book provides a thorough overview of two decades of election law cases and sheds light on the impact these decisions have had on remaking America’s electoral institutions.
Aiello, 452 Fed. App'x 699 (8th Cir. 2012); United States v. Potter, 630 F.3d 1260 (9th Cir. 2011); United States v. Dugan, 657 F.3d 998 (9th Cir. 2011); United States v. Henry, 688 F.3d 637 (9th Cir. 2012); United States v.
Potter Stewart 71 17 Byron White Voice vote Arthur J. Goldberg Voice vote Abe Fortas Voice vote Thurgood Marshall 69 ... F. Powell Jr. 89 1 William H. Rehnquist 68 26 John Paul Stevens 98 0 Sandra Day O'Connor 99 0 William H. Rehnquist ...
As the eminent law and politics scholars Neal Devins and Lawrence Baum show in The Company They Keep, justices today are reacting far more to subtle social forces in their own elite legal world than to pressure from the other branches of ...
He was a partisan, waging a quiet, constant battle to imbue the Court with a deep conservatism favoring government power over individual rights. The story of how and why Rehnquist rose to power is as compelling as it is improbable.
If public trust is now in decline, one part of the solution is to promote better understandings of how the judiciary actually works: how judges adhere to their oaths and how they try to avoid considerations of politics and popularity.
Partisan Supremacy tells the story of the GOP's largely successful efforts to employ the courts to shift election law in its favor.