How Grant secured a Tennessee victory and a promotion Union soldiers in the Army of the Cumberland, who were trapped and facing starvation or surrender in the fall of 1863, saw the arrival of Major General Ulysses S. Grant in Tennessee as an impetus to reverse the tides of war. David A. Powell’s sophisticated strategic and operational analysis of Grant’s command decisions and actions shows how his determined leadership relieved the siege and shattered the enemy, resulting in the creation of a new strategic base of Union operations and Grant’s elevation to commander of all the Federal armies the following year. Powell’s detailed exploration of the Union Army of the Cumberland’s six-week-long campaign for Chattanooga is complemented by his careful attention to the personal issues Grant faced at the time and his relationships with his superiors and subordinates. Though unfamiliar with the tactical situation, the army, and its officers, Grant delivered another resounding victory. His success, explains Powell, was due to his tactical flexibility, communication with his superiors, perseverance despite setbacks, and dogged determination to win the campaign. Through attention to postwar accounts, Powell reconciles the differences between what happened and the participants’ memories of the events. He focuses throughout on Grant’s controversial decisions, showing how they were made and their impact on the campaign. As Powell shows, Grant’s choices demonstrate how he managed to be a thoughtful, deliberate commander despite the fog of war.
he snapped. A surprised sergeant looked up. “Sergeant, what is your name?” “Len Gardner, sir, Third Louisiana.” Lee turned to Walter. “Note that name, Walter. Sergeant Gardner, if I hear of any accounts of abuse of ...
Much more than a book on military strat-egy, this innovative volume examines the decision-making process that enabled Grant both to excel as an unquestioned commander and to win.
For all the literature about Civil War military operations and leadership, precious little has been written about strategy, particularly in what has become known as the eastern theater.
In the sequel The Fruits of Victory, Angell expands his thesis to incorporate lessons learned from World War I.
In fact, Cooling's greatest contribution may be his clear demonstration that Grant was fooled by Early's operations and took an uncommonly long time to react to a very serious threat.”—American Historical Review“Cooling's superb ...
During Sherman's and Porter's visit to Grant on that date, mentioned in Sherman's June 2 message to Grant, Sherman found Grant “complaining of illness.” Again, illness did not necessarily translate to drinking, but the implication is ...
This new printing makes the classic story available to a new generation who will appreciate Vandiver's flair for writing history in fluid prose.
In this book he uses original documents, published works and personal accounts to weave together an enthralling account of some of the bitterest fighting of WWII.
Ed . Frederick D. Williams . East Lansing : Michigan State Univ . Press , 1964 . Genco , James G. , ed . To the Sound of Musketry and Tap of the Drum : A History of Michigan's Battery D through the Letters of Artificer Harold J.
He had shot first, and now she needed him to be sorry enough to correct his direction. Leon confessed that he recognized his impulsive tendency and that it manifested itself elsewhere in his life. “He wanted me to know that he was aware ...