Roman religion has long presented a number of challenges to historians approaching the subject from a perspective framed by the three Abrahamic religions. The Romans had no sacred text that espoused its creed or offered a portrait of its foundational myth. They described relations with the divine using technical terms widely employed to describe relations with other humans. Indeed, there was not even a word in classical Latin that corresponds to the English word religion. In The Gods, the State, and the Individual, John Scheid confronts these and other challenges directly. If Roman religious practice has long been dismissed as a cynical or naïve system of borrowed structures unmarked by any true piety, Scheid contends that this is the result of a misplaced expectation that the basis of religion lies in an individual's personal and revelatory relationship with his or her god. He argues that when viewed in the light of secular history as opposed to Christian theology, Roman religion emerges as a legitimate phenomenon in which rituals, both public and private, enforced a sense of communal, civic, and state identity. Since the 1970s, Scheid has been one of the most influential figures reshaping scholarly understanding of ancient Roman religion. The Gods, the State, and the Individual presents a translation of Scheid's work that chronicles the development of his field-changing scholarship.
In Battling the Gods, Tim Whitmarsh journeys into the ancient Mediterranean, a world almost unimaginably different from our own, to recover the stories and voices of those who first refused the divinities.
But what does it mean when Greek texts time and again speak of purity of mind, soul, and thoughts? This book takes a radical new look at the Ancient Greek notions of purity and pollution.
Rethinking Roman Religion Jacob L. Mackey. REFERENCES Abatino, B., G. Dari-Mattiacci, and E. C. Perotti. (2011). “Depersonalization of Business in Ancient Rome. ... Roman Social Imaginaries: Language and Thought in Contexts of Empire.
The Individual and the State
Do the gods love you? Cicero gives deep and surprising answers in two philosophical dialogues on traditional Roman religion.
Examines Nietzsche's complex attitudes toward religion and his understanding of how particular religions and deities affect the intellectual, moral, and spiritual lives of their various proselytes and adherents.
82, 100 Schoeps, J.H. 175 Schwartz, M. 17 Sells, M. 121, 126, 142 Shackle, C. 53 Shahzadi,, M.F.S. 20, 27 Sheldon, C.M. 290 Shimazono, S. 171,214, 215 Singh, G. 53 Singh, H. 53 Singh, K. 53 Singh, N. 53 Singh, N-G.K. 33-53 Singh, ...
In Honor Thy Gods Jon Mikalson uses the tragedies of Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides to explore popular religious beliefs and practices of Athenians in the fifth and fourth centuries B.C. and examines how these playwrights portrayed, ...
Based on Nietzsche's critique of religion and culture, and engaging the contemporary offshoots of that critique, this book assesses the myths of origins that have been used to articulate the fundamental attitude toward the relationship ...
The fate of the populace should be left in the hands of the gods, not snatched from their control by the individual. Later, the state replaced the gods as the authority, and suicide was then deemed wrong because humans belonged to the ...