Does American free speech doctrine discriminate against women and minorities? In Hate Speech, Pornography, and the Radical Attack on Free Speech Doctrine, James Weinstein carefully examines the charge that in interpreting the First Amendment as protecting hate speech and pornography while allowing myriad other exceptions to free speech, American courts have privileged the interests of the rich and powerful over the interests of women and people of color. The author concludes that while free speech doctrine is not in any deep sense as neutral as some of its apologists believe, the claim that free speech decisions and principles systematically discriminate against women and minorities does not withstand scrutiny. He shows that this claim of discrimination is based upon a profound but widely shared misunderstanding of the actual workings of free speech doctrine.In order to expose this misunderstanding, the first section of the book thoroughly explores the basic cases and principles upon which free speech doctrine is built. The second section demonstrates that the relationship between free speech and equality is far more complex than either radical critics or many liberal defenders of doctrine suppose. The third section considers the cost and benefits of modifying free speech doctrine to allow for the suppression of hate speech and pornography. After reviewing the experience of hate speech and pornography in other democracies, Weinstein concludes that while such a modification would not lead straight to totalitarianism as alarmist defenders of current doctrine contend, it would nonetheless likely inhibit legitimate debate and artistic expression. Also contrary to dogmatic defenders of current doctrine, the author concludes that although the scientific evidence that pornography causes violence to women is not nearly as conclusive as radical feminists assert, this evidence is nonetheless cause for concern.While offering a scholarly analysis of the radical critique of free speech doctrine, this book has even larger ambition: to provide nonlawyers with the background to participate knowledgeably in the continuing debate about the role of free speech in a democratic society.
This book considers the legal responses of various liberal democracies towards hate speech and other forms of extreme expression, and examines the following questions: What accounts for the marked differences in attitude towards the ...
The contributors to this volume consider whether it is possible to establish carefully tailored hate speech policies that are cognizant of the varying traditions, histories and values of different countries.
_____ (2010) 'Freedom of Speech and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Tort', Cardozo Law Review De Novo 2010: 300–312. _____ (2011a) 'In Defense of the ... Hate Speech, Pornography and Radical Attacks on Free Speech Doctrine.
For a precise description of the basics of the American free speech doctrine, see James Weinstein, Hate Speech, Pornography, And Radical Attacks On Free Speech Doctrine (Routledge 2018). For a 'celebration' of the First Amendment, ...
Weinstein , J , 1999 , Hate Speech , Pornography and the Radical Attack on Free Speech Doctrine , Westview Press , Colorado . Wright , JS , 1982 , ' Money and the Pollution of Politics : Is the First Amendment an Obstacle to Political ...
Contributors argue that hate speech restrictions on college campuses are dangerous and counterproductive.
Fully revised and updated, this title examines topical issues such as free speech and freedom of the press, as well as considering other important developments and legislation.
58 James Weinstein, Hate Speech Bans, Democracy, and Political Legitimacy, 35 Const. Comment. 527 (2017). For Weinstein's earlier work in this area, see, Hate Speech, Pornography, and the Radical Attack on Free Speech Doctrine (1999).
Other liberals , such as Nadine Strossen , defend pornography because of its contribution to women's “ freedom and ... Hate Speech , Pornography , and the Radical Attack on Free Speech Doctrine ( Boulder , CO : Westview , 1999 ) .
... 1988; see also Daniel S. Levy, “Behind the Anti-War Protests That Swept America in 1968,” Time, January 19, 2018 (“While a March 1967 poll had shown that more than half of Americans supported the way Johnson was handling the war, ...