Why did some offenses in the South end in mob lynchings while similar crimes led to legal executions? Why did still other cases have nonlethal outcomes? In this well-researched and timely book, Margaret Vandiver explores the complex relationship between these two forms of lethal punishment, challenging the assumption that executions consistently grew out of-and replaced-lynchings. Vandiver begins by examining the incidence of these practices in three culturally and geographically distinct southern regions. In rural northwest Tennessee, lynchings outnumbered legal executions by eleven to one and many African Americans were lynched for racial caste offenses rather than for actual crimes. In contrast, in Shelby County, which included the growing city of Memphis, more men were legally executed than lynched. Marion County, Florida, demonstrated a firmly entrenched tradition of lynching for sexual assault that ended in the early 1930s with three legal death sentences in quick succession. With a critical eye to issues of location, circumstance, history, and race, Vandiver considers the ways that legal and extralegal processes imitated, influenced, and differed from each other. A series of case studies demonstrates a parallel between mock trials that were held by lynch mobs and legal trials that were rushed through the courts and followed by quick executions. Tying her research to contemporary debates over the death penalty, Vandiver argues that modern death sentences, like lynchings of the past, continue to be influenced by factors of race and place, and sentencing is comparably erratic.
Zimmerman, Paul R. “State Executions, Deterrence, and the Incidence of Murder.” 7 Journal of Applied Economics 163 (2004). Available at http://www.cema.edu.ar/ publicaciones/download/volumen7/zimmerman.pdf Codes and Statutes Civil ...
This text challenges students to evaluate their beliefs and assumptions on each of the various issues surrounding this controversial subject.
Powell, unlike the other four justices who would later change their views on the death penalty, did not express any change of heart while sitting on the Court. Indeed, he retired from the Court very shortly after authoring the majority ...
This book addresses one of the most controversial issues in the criminal justice system today—the death penalty. Paternoster et al. present a balanced perspective that focuses on both the arguments...
Justices Brennan, Marshall, and Douglas dissented. One year later, Justices Harlan and Black had retired, and McGautha was reversed in Furman v. Georgia. PART TWO—FROM FURMAN TO GREGG: 1972–1976 Introduction During the 1960s, ...
These are the usual questions at the heart of the increasingly heated debate about capital punishment in America. In this bold and impassioned book, Austin Sarat seeks to change the terms of that debate.
... Demarco 537 McCutcheon, J.F. 255 McDermott, George T. 55 McDonald, J.E. 174 McDonald, Jim 157 McDonald, Samuel, Jr. 366 McDougall, Michael 393 McDuff, Kenneth 536 McElmurry, Harold 403 McElvaine, Charles see McElvaine v.
In his first book since the Pulitzer Prize-winning Polio: An American Story, renowned historian David Oshinsky takes a new and closer look at the Supreme Court's controversial and much-debated stances...
This book will be indispensable to anyone--scholar, policy maker, or lay person--who must be informed on the issue of capital punishment.
Examines the debate and issues surrounding the death penalty by presenting its history, significant court rulings, and opinions and arguments from supporters and detractors alike.