Simon Episcopius (1583-1643), who began his theological career as the protégé of Jacobus Arminius, led the Arminians at the Synod of Dort and was instrumental in guaranteeing Arminianism's survival. This book breaks new ground by clearly showing how, in the process of working out the implications of the theological trajectories which Arminius established, Episcopius introduced significant changes in his master's theology. It begins by demonstrating changes between Episcopius' early theological works and Arminius' writings, and then even greater changes in his mature theological work, Institutiones Theologicæ. It defends the idea that Arminianism represented a pre-Calvinist movement within the Netherlands, which not only rejected Genevan predestination, but also intentionally moved away from Reformed Scholasticism. This book is useful for seminars in early Arminian theology and the Arminian controversy in the Netherlands.
From at least 1640 Charles' opponents had drawn upon the language of natural law; when the Scots prepared to enter England they justified their actions as defensive, prompted by. 8 The story is most recently told in J. Adamson, ...
310. Works, III, An Unregenerate, 324–5. 311. Quoted in Ellis, Simon Episcopius' Doctrine of Original Sin, 76. 312. Ellis, Simon Episcopius' Doctrine of Original Sin, 64–5. 313. Ellis, Simon Episcopius' Doctrine of Original Sin, 66.
In this book, Thomas H. McCall and Keith D. Stanglin offer a historical introduction to Arminian theology as it developed in modern thought, providing an account that is based upon important primary sources and recent secondary research ...
Mark Ellis, in his recent book on the doctrine of original sin, compares Arminius and Episcopius on this issue and stresses that, although there are some significant theological and methodological differences, Episcopius develops ...
The first generation of Remonstrants, led by Simon Episcopius, followed Arminius's theology closely; this is nowhere clearer than in Episcopius's doctrine of original sin and inherited depravity. Like his mentor, Episcopius adamantly ...
See also extensive comparisons in my dissertation, “Simon Episcopius and the Doctrine of Original Sin” (Ph.D. diss, Dallas Theological Seminary, 2002) One of the most important of his students was Stephanus Curcellus.
these important discussions in Episcopius, but they are much altered in key areas when compared to corresponding ... Here I am following Mark A. Ellis, Simon Episcopius' Doctrine of Original Sin (New York: Peter Lang, 2006), esp.
8 These studies include Mark Alan Ellis, 'Simon Episcopius's Doctrine of Original Sin' (Ph.D. diss., Dallas Theological Seminary, 2002); John Mark Hicks, 'The Theology of Grace in the Thought of Jacobus Arminius and Philip van Limborch: ...
See Mark A. Ellis, Simon Episcopius' Doctrine of Original Sin (New York: Peter Lang, 2006).] Socinus, The Height of Universal Christian Theology according to the Unitarians. Limborch expressly opposes the Calvinistic theory.
2 Arminianism and Hebraism in the Dutch Republic Socinian approaches to Old Testament promises were particularly influential on Arminian theologians in ... Mark A. Ellis, Simon Episcopius'Doctrine of Original Sin (New York, 2006), 32.