A fundamental critique of American law and legal thought, Against the Law consists of a series of essays written from three different perspectives that coalesce into a deep criticism of contemporary legal culture. Paul F. Campos, Pierre Schlag, and Steven D. Smith challenge the conventional representations of the legal system that are articulated and defended by American legal scholars. Unorthodox, irreverent, and provocative,Against the Law demonstrates that for many in the legal community, law has become a kind of substitute religion—an essentially idolatrous practice composed of systematic self-misrepresentation and self-deception. Linked by a persistent inquiry into the nature and identity of “the law,” these essays are informed by the conviction that the conventional representations of law, both in law schools and the courts, cannot be taken at face value—that the law, as commonly conceived, makes no sense. The authors argue that the relentlessly normative prescriptions of American legal thinkers are frequently futile and, indeed, often pernicious. They also argue that the failure to recognize the role that authorship must play in the production of legal thought plagues both the teaching and the practice of American law. Ranging from the institutional to the psychological and metaphysical deficiencies of the American legal system, the depth of criticism offered byAgainst the Law is unprecedented. In a departure from the nearly universal legitimating and reformist tendencies of American legal thought, this book will be of interest not only to the legal academics under attack in the book, but also to sociologists, historians, and social theorists. More particularly, it will engage all the American lawyers who suspect that there is something very wrong with the nature and direction of their profession, law students who anticipate becoming part of that profession, and those readers concerned with the status of the American legal system.
'Tell the fenmen who object to the loss of freedom which enclosure of the fens entailed of the great benefit to the public because where a pike or a duck fed formerly, now a bullock or sheep is fatted; they will be ready to return that ...
Publisher description
Cantrell's dark eyebrows went up. He was a goodlooking man even with his fierce expression. Square jaw, short brown hair and light blue eyes. He looked her over, for the first time actually seemed to see her. “Hard to argue with that.
Most early definitions were based on three elements: penetration, the use of force, and the absence of consent (Spohn and Horney 1992). However, the growth of the feminist movement in the 1970s contributed to a redefinition of rape, ...
A cautionary analysis of the new federal business ethics requirements, enacted as a result of corporate scandals involving Enron and other companies, contends that employees are being forced to violate laws in the areas of organizational ...
Through these texts and interviews, Art Against the Law proves that creative imagination can be formidable in challenging the status quo.
In this book, first published in 1955, Peter Wildeblood tells the story of his childhood and schooldays, his war service and university days, his life as a journalist, his arrest, trial and imprisonment, and finally his return to freedom.
Although feminist strategies of inclusion have been necessary as well as symbolically powerful for women, the book argues that they also carry their own problems and limitations, prevent a more radical transformation of the human rights ...
This book offers an in-depth and critical analysis of the Istanbul Convention, along with discussions on its impact and implications.
This book discusses the salience of the caste question in UK law.