"Mental Health Review Tribunals (MHRTs) were established under the Mental Health Act (MHA) 1959 as one of the 'main safeguards against improper admission under compulsory powers' and 'unduly protracted detention'. The statutory provisions were tightened in the 1983 MHA in an attempt to provide a better safeguard for the rights of patients (MHA Commission, 1985)." "This study set out to examine how MHRTs make decisions about whether or not to discharge patients detained under sections 2 and 3 of the Mental Health Act (1983). The research identified significant differences in operation between tribunals from the pre-hearing meeting through to the deliberation. Such was the degree of variation that questions must be raised about the extent to which tribunals in general can be said to provide a safeguard against unduly protracted detention in hospital."--BOOK JACKET.Title Summary field provided by Blackwell North America, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Providing a unique insight into the decision making processes of Mental Health Review Tribunals and of the motivations and aspiriations of the patients and psychiatrists appearing before them, this book...
In the eighteenth century, in law if not in practice, cases such as R v Clarke (1762) 3 Burr 1362 and R v Coate (1772) Lofft 73 would suggest that legal authority had to be sought to house a lunatic in a psychiatric facility.
This book will be of interest to academic and other researchers, students, policy-makers, law reformers, commentators and anyone interested in the field of criminal justice, mental health law and public policy.
The Review was commissioned in response to community concerns over the level of consideration given by the Tribunal to public safety and the victims affected by the offence, and the 'transparency' of Tribunal decisions.
... NJ , " Reporting of Adverse Events in Hospitals in Victoria 1994-1995 " ( 1997 ) 166 Medical Journal of Australia 460 ; Brennan , TA , Leape , LL and Laird , NM , " Incidence of Adverse Events and Negligence in Hospitalized Patients ...
This book recommends a sweeping redesign of the American health care system and provides overarching principles for specific direction for policymakers, health care leaders, clinicians, regulators, purchasers, and others.
The consequences of this are seriousâ€"for these individuals and their families; their employers and the workforce; for the nation's economy; as well as the education, welfare, and justice systems.
The book also provides answers to frequently asked questions and provides top tips to help guide through the whole process.
This publication highlights key issues and principles to be considered in the drafting, adoption and implementation of mental health legislation and best practice in mental health services.
The aim of this collection is to encourage the enactment of legal provisions governing treatment, detention and care that are workable and conform to international human rights documents.