An examination of international attempts to develop common principles for regulating criminal evidence across different legal traditions.
This book provides practitioners, scholars and students with an in-depth analysis of the law of evidence before international criminal tribunals.
seeking the truth.96 He performs his task in view of the principle of the judge's freedom to evaluate the evidence.97 According to this principle, judges in Germany are not bound by technical rules of evidence. This has sometimes led to ...
The book provides guidance on how to confront legal as well as factual issues.
The book is a comprehensive narration of the use of expertise in international criminal trials offering reflection on standards concerning the quality and presentation of expert evidence.
It is therefore not unexpected that many contributions in the present volume cover first and foremost the jurisprudence of these two tribunals. In contrast, the International Criminal Court (ICC) has not yet concluded a full case cycle.
This book brings together experienced judges, prosecutors, lawyers, scientists, and commentators who have dealt with questions of old evidence in their work.
This commentary brings together the relevant body of law on evidence at international criminal courts and tribunals and provides both a detailed description and analysis thereof.
Twining, W, Theories of Evidence, Bentham and Wigmore (London, Weidenfled and Nicholson, 1985). Twining, W, Rethinking Evidence (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1990). Twining, W, Rethinking Evidence – Exploratory Essays, ...
Discusses judicial control of foreign evidence in comparative perspective
The Uncertain Evidentiary Foundations of International Criminal Convictions Nancy A. Combs ... Elizabeth, et al., Eyewitness Testimony: Civil and Criminal (2007) Luban, David, Lawyers and Justice: An Ethical Study (1988) Lubet, Steven, ...