Since publication of the seventh edition of this seminal text, personal injury law has witnessed momentous changes. A major overhaul of the social security system began in 2012 and the Equality Act 2010 significantly modifies anti-discrimination law and its impact on the disabled. But perhaps the most important legal developments have affected the financing and conduct of personal injury claiming and the operation of the claims-management industry. This new edition takes account of all this activity while setting it into a wider and longer perspective. Complaints that Britain is a 'compensation culture' and that the tort system is out of control are explained and assessed and options for further change are explored. Through the turmoil and controversy, the tort system remains a central feature of the legal and social landscape. The book's enduring central argument for its radical reform remains as compelling as ever.
Atiyah's Accidents, Compensation, and the Law
The seventh edition of this classic work explores recent momentous changes in personal injury law and practice and puts them into broad perspective.
This book offers nine key ideas about tort law that will help the reader to understand its various social functions and evaluate its effectiveness in performing those functions.
In this searching critique of the present law and practice relating to damages, Professor Patrick Atiyah shows that this system is in fact a lottery.
This is the second volume in the annual McPherson Lecture Series, inaugurated by the University of Queensland TC Beirne Law School, which hosts a celebrated international scholar or legal expert to deliver a series of three lectures.
Written to be accessible to all readers with a basic knowledge of tort law, this book adopts an approach which is both easily comprehended, yet also innovative and illuminating.
The industry position was later supported by the ECJ Sanchez case,52 in the light of which private funding in Sweden and Finland (and Norway) looks curious, rather than the other way round. The Danish scheme always considers whether it ...
The rationale and policies behind Vaughan v. Menlove, in addition to supporting an objective negligence standard, apply more broadly to the choice of law problem.8 Suppose X is standing in state A and throwing stones at Y, ...
This wide-ranging book-length treatment of the subject compares tribunals in three major jurisdictions: Australia the UK and the US. It analyses and offers an account of the concept of 'administrative adjudication', and traces its ...
Accidents, Compensation and the Law