The First Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press ..." This language restricts government both more and less than it would if it were applied literally. It restricts government more in that it applies not only to Congress, but to all branches of the federal government, and to all branches of state and local government. It restricts government less in that it provides no protection to some types of speech and only limited protection to others. This report provides an overview of the major exceptions to the First Amendment -- of the ways that the Supreme Court has interpreted the guarantee of freedom of speech and press to provide no protection or only limited protection for some types of speech. For example, the Court has decided that the First Amendment provides no protection to obscenity, child pornography, or speech that constitutes "advocacy of the use of force or of law violation ... where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action." The Court has also decided that the First Amendment provides less than full protection to commercial speech, defamation (libel and slander), speech that may be harmful to children, speech broadcast on radio and television, and public employees' speech. Even speech that enjoys the most extensive First Amendment protection may be subject to "regulations of the time, place, and manner of expression which are content-neutral, are narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest, and leave open ample alternative channels of communication." And, even speech that enjoys the most extensive First Amendment protection may be restricted on the basis of its content if the restriction passes "strict scrutiny," i.e., if the government shows that the restriction serves "to promote a compelling interest" and is "the least restrictive means to further the articulated interest."
The Debate of Freedom of Speech in the House of Commons in February 1621
Blasi , Vince . " Prior Restraints on Demonstrations , " Michi - gan Law Review 68 ( August , 1970 ) , 1481-1574 . Boccarosse , Ralph N. ' ' Lloyd Corporation v . Tanner : Expression of First Amendment Rights in the Privately owned ...
Recht am Wort: Schutz des eigenen Wortes im System von Art. 28 ZGB
On Day 2 . computer expert Donna Hoffman of Vanderbilt University testified for the plaintiffs . Hoffman , who had criticized the Time article about cyberporn , believed that the Internet was different from the broadcast media because ...
The Law of Public Communication: ... Update
Smolla and Nimmer on Freedom of Speech
A cogent, objective, and in-depth exploration of the legal, political, and social complexities of the decision to ban hate speech.
This is the perfect volume for anyone - student, general reader, or scholar - looking for an accessible overview of this critical topic.
Discusses how media have "packaged" the war in Iraq [2003], exploring the way the media have presented the war by telling human interest stories, supporting public policies, and crafting a narrative that supports the war.
An examination - and rejection - of the charge that, in interpreting the First Amendment as protecting hate speech and pornography while allowing other exceptions to the free-speech principle, American courts have favoured the interests of ...