This is a path-breaking study by leading scholars of comparative politics examining the internal transformations of dominant parties in both authoritarian and democratic settings. The principle question examined in this book is what happens to dominant political parties when they lose or face the very real prospect of losing? Using country-specific case studies, top-rank analysts in the field focus on the lessons that dominant parties might learn from losing and the adaptations they consequently make in order to survive, to remain competitive or to ultimately re-gain power. Providing historical based, comparative research on issues of theoretical importance, Political Transitions in Dominant Party Systems will be invaluable reading for students and scholars of comparative politics, international politics and political parties.
Why did most eventually lose? Why Dominant Parties Lose develops a theory of single-party dominance, its durability, and its breakdown into fully competitive democracy.
In this collection of original essays, thirteen country specialists working within a common comparative frame of reference analyze major examples of long-term, single-party rule in industrialized democracies.
96–102, 104; Enzo Santarelli, Storia Critica della Repubblica (Milano: Feltrinelli, 1996); Arrigo Levi, Un'Idea dell'Italia (Milano: Mondadori, 1979). Martin Shefter, “Party and Patronage: Germany, England and Italy,” in Politics and ...
In this volume, a group of experts are gathered to analyze this progression on a comparative level.
The closest thing to a left party in the 1987 and 1988 elections was Kim Dae Jung's Peace and Democracy Party (PDP), which gained about 25 percent of the presidential votes, slightly more than half the share received by “continuists” ...
In this volume, a group of experts are gathered to analyze this progression on a comparative level.
This book examines dominant parties in both established democracies and new democracies and explores the relationship between dominant parties and the democratic process.
Why did most eventually lose? Why Dominant Parties Lose develops a theory of single-party dominance, its durability, and its breakdown into fully competitive democracy.
Considering these questions, the authors of this collaborative work use a rigorous comparative research design and rich case material to greatly enhance our understanding of one of the key issues confronting emerging democracies in sub ...
Hence it does not go by definition that other parties are outlawed ; they might have dissolved themselves , or be atrophied , or might have never materialized de facto . Here I specify , therefore , whether the other parties are banned ...