Is or has economics ever been the imperial social science? Could or should it ever be so? These are the central concerns of this book. It involves a critical reflection on the process of how economics became the way it is, in terms of a narrow and intolerant orthodoxy, that has, nonetheless, increasingly directed its attention to appropriating the subject matter of other social sciences through the process termed "economics imperialism". In other words, the book addresses the shifting boundaries between economics and the other social sciences as seen from the confines of the dismal science, with some reflection on the responses to the economic imperialists by other disciplines. Significantly, an old economics imperialism is identified of the "as if market" style most closely associated with Gary Becker, the public choice theory of Buchanan and Tullock and cliometrics. But this has given way to a more "revolutionary" form of economics imperialism associated with the information-theoretic economics of Akerlof and Stiglitz, and the new institutional economics of Coase, Wiliamson and North. Embracing one "new" field after another, economics imperialism reaches its most extreme version in the form of "freakonomics", the economic theory of everything on the basis of the most shallow principles. By way of contrast and as a guiding critical thread, a thorough review is offered of the appropriate principles underpinning political economy and its relationship to social science, and how these have been and continue to be deployed. The case is made for political economy with an interdisciplinary character, able to bridge the gap between economics and other social sciences, and draw upon and interrogate the nature of contemporary capitalism.
Could a science that cannot answer its own core questions really be used to explain the logic of everyday life? This book was originally published as a special issue of the Journal of Economic Methodology.
Since it first appeared in 1975, Ben Fine's introductory account of Capital has become the most popular text of its kind, used widely across the social sciences and also read by a wider audience.
Tracing the evolution of social capital since his highly acclaimed contribution of 2001 (Social Capital Versus Social Theory), Ben Fine consolidates his position as the world's leading critic of the...
Lloyd, C. (1986) Explanation in Social History, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Loasby, B. (1976) Choice, Complexity and Ignorance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lucas, R. (1981) Studies in Business-Cycle Theory, Oxford: Basil ...
This brilliantly concise book is a classic introduction to Marx’s key work, Capital.
The book contains thirty-four chapters written by academics and experts in the field of international political economy. The chapters in the Handbook look at the history of economic imperialism from the early modern age to the present.
Economists persistently pursue just this: 'Economists are always looking for the hidden logic of life, the way it is shaped by ... Even though models are simple fictional worlds, they can be used for representing the complex real world.
This brilliantly concise book is a classic introduction to Marx’s key work, Capital.
Richard Westra. show how in more concrete situations of economic and institutional change they are to be operationalized. And how cognizance of them helps us navigate thorny issues for the future of environmental sustainability and ...
... Judea offer a helpful reminder that greed and obsessiveness over money are . enduring , intractable aspects of what it means to be human . Bibliography Adams , Samuel L. " Poverty and ' Otherness ' in Second Temple ... Social and Economic ...