Few can imagine a world without telephones or televisions; many depend on computers and the Internet as part of daily life. Without scientific theory, these developments would not have been possible. In this exceptionally clear and engaging introduction to philosophy of science, James Ladyman explores the philosophical questions that arise when we reflect on the nature of the scientific method and the knowledge it produces. He discusses whether fundamental philosophical questions about knowledge and reality might be answered by science, and considers in detail the debate between realists and antirealists about the extent of scientific knowledge. Along the way, central topics in philosophy of science, such as the demarcation of science from non-science, induction, confirmation and falsification, the relationship between theory and observation and relativism are all addressed. Important and complex current debates over underdetermination, inference to the best explaination and the implications of radical theory change are clarified and clearly explained for those new to the subject.
"In this new edition Samir Ikasha reviews the main themes of contemporary philosophy of science.
In this book, epistemologists and philosophers of science together address basic questions about the nature of understanding, providing a new overview of the field.
In this book, epistemologists and philosophers of science together address basic questions about the nature of understanding, providing a new overview of the field.
This work may be used as a map to identify the various stages in the road to scientific knowledge.Philosophy of Science is divided into two volumes, each with two parts.
The chapters in this book highlight the multifaceted nature of the process of scientific research.
The description for this book, Cosmic Understanding: Philosophy and Science of the Universe, will be forthcoming.
This book explores central philosophical concepts, issues, and debates in the philosophy of science, both historical and contemporary.
repeated observations of black ravens can confirm the generalization that all ravens are black? ... And here is another obvious- looking point: any evidence that confirms a hypothesis H also confirms any hypothesis that is logically ...
pressure as 'the elaborations of Nagel's model. For Nagel, reduction is the (deductive) explanation of a theory by another theory. Nagel pointed out that typically, in real cases, in order for reduction to be effected 'additional ...
I need not highlight these selected epistemological papers gathered as, and about, Models, since Wartofsky's own introductory remarks are helpful and stimulating in that respect.