Despite decades of attempts and the best intentions of its members, the United States Supreme Court has failed to develop a coherent jurisprudence regarding the state’s proper relationship to the individual. Without some objective standard upon which to ground jurisprudence, decisions have moved along a spectrum between freedom and authority and back again, affecting issues as diverse as individual contractual liberties and the right to privacy. Social Contract Theory in American Jurisprudence seeks to reintroduce the lessons of modern political philosophy to offer a solution for this variable application of legal principle and to lay the groundwork for a jurisprudence consistent in both theory and practice. Thomas R. Pope’s argument examines two exemplary court cases, Lochner v. New York and West Coast Hotel v. Parrish, and demonstrates how the results of these cases failed to achieve the necessary balance of liberty and the public good because they considered the matter in terms of a dichotomy. Pope explores our constitution’s roots in social contract theory, looking particularly to the ideas of Thomas Hobbes for a jurisprudence that is consistent with the language and tradition of the Constitution, and that is also more effectually viable than existing alternatives. Pope concludes with an examination of recent cases before the Court, grounding his observations firmly within the developments of ongoing negotiation of jurisprudence. Addressing the current debate between individual liberty and government responsibility within the context of contemporary jurisprudence, Pope considers the implications of a Hobbesian founding for modern policy. This book will be particularly relevant to scholars of Constitutional Law, the American Founding, and Modern Political Theory.
Because most Americans believe that government requires the consent of the governed, the idea of the social contract may come as close to a public philosophy as we've ever had....
Netting, Balancing on An Alp, p. 46. 10 11 Though moderate, the scarcity is sufficient to call into play 421 19.2 Common Property Resource Regimes.
This is a book about the nature of law and its proposition is law should embody justice-but it does not.
Though the revised edition of A Theory of Justice, published in 1999, is the definitive statement of Rawls's view, so much of the extensive literature on Rawls's theory refers to the first edition.
C. B. MacPherson (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.) (1st pub. 1690). Lyons, David (1965), Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism (Oxford: Oxford University Press). MacCormick, Neil (1978), Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (Oxford: ...
This book's relevance to appreciating the development of the American legal system in all its complexities - including liability law, contract law, and property law - is in itself notable.
Reason and agreement in social contract views ; Utilitarianism, deontology, and the priority of right ; Consequentialism, publicity, stability, and property-owning democracy ; Rawls and luck egalitarianism ; Congruence and the good of ...
"For academics, this book sets out a unique framework for the development of theories and criteria; for students, it provides a clear explanation of business ethics, sustainable development, and compliance; and for managers, it presents a ...
See, for example, O. F. Robinson, The Criminal Law of Ancient Rome (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 99 ), 9; David Johnston, “The General Influence of Roman Institutions of State and Public Law,” in The Civilian Tradition and Scots Law: ...
Shortly after, one of your own officers, Officer Thompson, reports that the suspect has crossed into your jurisdiction and she has taken over as the lead vehicle. Officer Thompson has two years of experience on the job.