The question of whether it is ever permissible to believe on insufficient evidence has once again become a live question. Greater attention is now being paid to practical dimensions of belief, namely issues related to epistemic virtue, doxastic responsibility, and voluntarism. In this book, McCormick argues that the standards used to evaluate beliefs are not isolated from other evaluative domains. The ultimate criteria for assessing beliefs are the same as those for assessing action because beliefs and actions are both products of agency. Two important implications of this thesis, both of which deviate from the dominant view in contemporary philosophy, are 1) it can be permissible (and possible) to believe for non-evidential reasons, and 2) we have a robust control over many of our beliefs, a control sufficient to ground attributions of responsibility for belief.
Evidence and Religious Belief features eleven new essays on the question of whether religious belief must be based on evidence in order to be rational.
Evidence and Agency is concerned with the question of how, as agents, we should take evidence into account when thinking about our future actions.
The first part of this book explores the ethics of belief from an individualistic framework, and the second part extends this traditional debate to issues concerning the social dimensions of belief formation.
This volume gathers eleven new and three previously unpublished essays that take on questions of epistemic justification, responsibility, and virtue.
In this book Colin Howson analyses in detail the evidence which is claimed to support belief in God's existence and argues that the claim is not well-founded.
This book provides an overview of recent work on developing a theory of statistical inference based on measuring statistical evidence.
In THE LANGUAGE OF GOD he explains his own journey from atheism to faith, and then takes the reader on a stunning tour of modern science to show that physics, chemistry and biology -- indeed, reason itself -- are not incompatible with ...
Groundless belief: An essay on the possibility of epistemology (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press. Chapter 11 Evidentialism and Moral Encroachment Georgi Gardiner Abstract Moral 168 J. Lackey.
Consider, next, William Lane Craig and his version of the Kalām cosmological argument. ... of the [claim “everything that begins to exist has a cause”].22 Craig's argument may be summarized as follows: P1: Everything that begins to ...
These specially written essays show that philosophy of religion is fertile ground for the application of probabilistic thinking.