This book provides a systematic analysis of many common argumentation schemes and a compendium of 96 schemes. The study of these schemes, or forms of argument that capture stereotypical patterns of human reasoning, is at the core of argumentation research. Surveying all aspects of argumentation schemes from the ground up, the book takes the reader from the elementary exposition in the first chapter to the latest state of the art in the research efforts to formalize and classify the schemes, outlined in the last chapter. It provides a systematic and comprehensive account, with notation suitable for computational applications that increasingly make use of argumentation schemes.
Where a is an agent, A is an action, and G a goal, the two basic types of practical inferences are respectively, the necessary condition scheme and the sufficient condition scheme ... 6 See Clarke (1985), Audi (1989), and Walton (Pract.
The advantages of seeing the role of the auxiliary experts as testifying to a source's epistemic character rather than being ... as modelled on Scheme 1, turn out to be patterns of independent convergent support rather than a pattern of ...
FIGURE 1.1 Rationale Argument Map of the Video Games Example Dr. Smith is an expert support in a field on a ... to classify the argument as an instance of the argumentation scheme for argument from expert opinion by enabling the user to ...
In F. H. van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair, C. A. Willard and A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Anyone who has a view: ... The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation, transl. by J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver. ... Boston (etc): Pearson.
This volume identifies and analyses English words and expressions that are crucial for an adequate reconstruction of argumentative discourse.
The book teaches by using examples of arguments in dialogues, both in the text itself and in the exercises. Examples of controversial legal, political, and ethical arguments are analyzed.
“The inference to the best explanation.” The Philosophical Review 74 (1): 88–95. ... “Salient meanings, default meanings, and automatic processing. ... Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature.
L. Goble (Oxford: Blackwell), 336–361. Huff, Darrel. 1954. How toLie with Statistics. ... King, John L.1979. 'Bivalence andthe Law ofExcluded Middle. ... Mann, WilliamC.1988. 'Dialogue Games: Conventions of Human Interaction.
... and Legal Rhetoric: An Analysis of Language Beliefs and the Law. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing. Rebuschi, Georges & Tuller, Laurice (eds.) (1999). The Grammar ofFocus. Amsterdam and Philadelphia:John Benjamins. Rescher, Nicholas ...
Rees, M. A. van. (1992b). Problem solving and critical discussion. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, & Ch. A. Willard (Eds.), Argumentation illuminated ( pp. 281-291). Amsterdam: Sic Sat, I. Rees, M. A. van. (1994a).