Recent years have seen the development of a growing international literature on restorative justice, community justice and reintegrative alternatives to formal criminal justice processes. This literature is stronger on theory and advocacy than on detailed evaluative studies. It often relies for its practical examples on the presumed historical practices of the indigenous peoples of colonised territories, or on attempts to revive or promote modified versions of these in a modern context, which has led to debates about how far modern communities can provide a viable setting for such initiatives. This book provides a unique study of the practice of traditional reintegrative community justice in a European society: the Parish Hall Enquiry (PHE) in the Channel Island of Jersey. This is an ancient institution, based on an informal hearing and discussion of a reported offence with the alleged offender and other interested parties, carried out by centeniers (honorary police officers elected to one of Jersey's twelve parishes). It is still in regular use as an integral part of a modern criminal justice system, and it usually aims to resolve offences without recourse to formal prosecution in court. Helen Miles and Peter Raynor's research, arising from direct observation, contributes to the literature on 'what works' in resolving conflicts and influencing offenders, and their detailed case studies of how problems are addressed gives a 'hands on' flavour of the process. The authors also document the aspects of community life in Jersey that facilitate or hinder the continuation of the PHEs, drawing out the implications of these findings for wider debates about the necessary and sufficient social conditions for reintegrative justice to succeed.
This new book aims to explore the key issues and debates surrounding the question of the incorporation and institutionalisation of restorative justice within existing penal and criminal justice systems, an increasingly pressing issue given ...
This book brings together a selection of papers originally presented and discussed at the fourth international restorative justice conference, held at the University of Tübingen.
Maxwell, G. and Shepherd, P. (1998), Evaluation of the Counselling for Families of Murder Victims Scheme, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet Crime Prevention Unit and Institute of Criminology, Wellington.
In criminology, as in other disciplines, researchers at all levels are drowning in potentially useful scholarly information, and this guide has been created as a tool for cutting through that material to find the exact source you need.
In Erik Claes, René Foqué & Tony Peters (Eds.), Punishment, Restorative Justice and the Morality of Law (pp. 121¥144). Oxford, UK: Intersentia. Duff, Antony (2005b). A Response to Walgrave, Van Stokkom, and Burms.
Shapland, J. (2003) 'Bringing victims in from the cold: victims' role in criminal justice', in J. Jackson and K. Quinn (eds), Criminal Justice Reform: Looking to the Future. Belfast: Queen's University Belfast, pp. 48–69.
Restorative Justice Today: Applications of Restorative Interventions takes a hard look at the issues and concepts surrounding restorative justice and current restorative practices used in a broad range of areas today.
Informal reckonings: Conflict resolutions in mediation, restorative justice, reparations. Oxon, UK: Routledge-Cavendish. Yantzi, M. (1998). Sexual offending and restoration. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: Herald Press.
A study examines the harmful gap between the theory of restorative justice (RJ) and its application in programs in the U.S., Europe, and elsewhere.
Presents an innovative, synergistic practice model that will help social workers use restorative justice skills to facilitate healing and recovery in the families and communities that they serve.