Slavery and the Atlantic slave trade are among the most heinous crimes against humanity committed in the modern era. Yet, to this day no former slave society in the Americas has paid reparations to former slaves or their descendants. European countries have never compensated their former colonies in the Americas, whose wealth relied on slave labor, to a greater or lesser extent. Likewise, no African nation ever obtained any form of reparations for the Atlantic slave trade. Ana Lucia Araujo argues that these calls for reparations are not only not dead, but have a long and persevering history. She persuasively demonstrates that since the 18th century, enslaved and freed individuals started conceptualizing the idea of reparations in petitions, correspondences, pamphlets, public speeches, slave narratives, and judicial claims, written in English, French, Spanish, and Portuguese. In different periods, despite the legality of slavery, slaves and freed people were conscious of having been victims of a great injustice. This is the first book to offer a transnational narrative history of the financial, material, and symbolic reparations for slavery and the Atlantic slave trade. Drawing from the voices of various social actors who identified themselves as the victims of the Atlantic slave trade and slavery, Araujo illuminates the multiple dimensions of the demands of reparations, including the period of slavery, the emancipation era, the post-abolition period, and the present.
Addresses how reparations might be obtained for the legacy of the Trans Atlantic slave trade. This collection lends weight to the argument that liability is not extinguished on the death of the plaintiffs or perpetrators.
Given the long history of European and American mistreatment of Africa, what is the just measure of Western obligations to the peoples of this continent?
It identifies the true victims and all the perpetrators. The book examines the pros and cons of the claims and highlights the resurgence of the African slave trade.
Analysis and Perception of African-Americans on Reparation for Slave Trade and Slavery
Perception of African-Americans on Reparation for Slave Trade and Slavery
A Concise History of Reparations For The TransAtlantic Slave Trade Raymond A. Winbush ... contrasts the style of writing between Frederick Douglass and William Lloyd Garrison's abolitionist newspapers, The North Star and the Liberator.
Chairman Conyers stated, " Essentially, this is a first-time historical examination of the circumstances surrounding the enslavement trade of Africans in the colonies in the United States.
In this book, Janna Thompson uses three case studies – France’s treatment of Haiti, Britain’s role in the African slave trade, and the plight of African Americans ‒ to address these questions.
This approach, called “bargaining for the common good,” is “a conscious effort to tie union– community ... and issued a report with local progressive organizations like Minnesota Youth Climate Strike and the Minnesota Black, Indigenous, ...
The more politic strategy, in Sumner's view, was to argue that arming black soldiers was a “military necessity.” See McPherson, Struggle, 90. 22. See Francis Jackson Garrison, William Lloyd Garrison, 1805–1879: The Story of His Life ...