How we understand, protect, and discharge our rights and responsibilities as citizens in a democratic society committed to the principle of political equality is intimately connected to the standards and behaviour of our media in general, and our news media in particular. However, the media does not just stand between the citizenry and their leaders, or indeed between citizens and each other. The media is often the site where individuals attempt to realise some of the most fundamental democratic liberties, including the right to free speech. Media Ethics, Free Speech, and the Requirements of Democracy explores the conflict between the rights that people exercise in, and through, the modern media and the responsibilities that accrue on account of its awesome and increasing power. The individual chapters—written by leading scholars from the US, UK, and Australia—address several recent events and controversial developments in the media, including Brexit, the rise of Trump, Lynton Crosby, Charlie Hebdo, dog-whistle politics, fake news, and political correctness. This much-needed philosophical treatment is a welcome addition to the recent literature in media ethics. It will be of interest to scholars across political and social philosophy, applied ethics, media and communication studies, and political science who are interested in the important issues surrounding the media and free speech and democracy.
Speech, Media, and Ethics: The Limits of Free Expression is an interdisciplinary work that employs ethics, liberal philosophy, and legal and media studies to outline the boundaries to freedom of expression and freedom of the press, defined ...
And naturally—since it pre-dated the digital revolution by about 60 years—it had nothing to say about the media's responsibilities in the digital age. Today, these are serious shortcomings. First, there is hypocrisy involved.
Gray's third justification of liberalism relates to the contractarian approach developed in John Rawls's theory of justice (1972). Rawls put forward the principle of justice which 'gives priority to the worst off in society in ...
The book begins with a sophisticated model for ethical decision-making, one that connects classical theories with the central purposes of journalism.
Beginning with German Idealism, the volume presents Kant's writings on freedom and their reception by contemporaries, successors, followers and critics.
These essays discuss US policy in regulating the media and the reconciliation of the First Amendment.
Nathanson, Patriotism, Morality and Peace, 37–38. 11. José Ortega. NOTES 1. Founders Online, “Letter from Thomas Jefferson to John Cartwright, 5 June 1824,” https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/98-01-02-4313. 2.
Cohen and Fraser reveal the caustically unprincipled impostors of our industry, the owners and managers they shill for - and the damage they have done. Read this book. Get mad as hell and let's make certain we don't take it any more.
These strategies would assist countries in tackling chronic poverty by providing a firm foundation for national development plans. Countries also needed to“work with civil society to make sure the poorest people are represented ...
This edition has been thoroughly updated to provide: discussions of issues reflecting the breadth and depth of the media spectrum numerous real-world examples broad discussion of confidentiality and other timely topics A Companion Website ...