Comparative Tort Law promotes a ‘learning by doing’ approach to comparative tort law and comparative methodology. Each chapter starts with a case scenario followed by questions and expertly selected material, such as: legislation, extracts of case law, soft law principles, and (where appropriate) extracts of legal doctrine. Using this material, students are invited to: • solve the proposed scenario according to the laws of several jurisdictions; • compare the approaches and solutions they have identified; • evaluate their respective pros and cons; and • reflect upon the most appropriate approach and solution. This book is essential reading for all students and scholars of comparative tort law and comparative law methodology and is the ideal companion for those wishing to both familiarise themselves with real-world materials and understand the many diverse approaches to modern tort law.
... and National Insurance [1968] 2 QB 497 58, 70, 73, 74, 76, 94 Reediev London and North Western Ry (1849) 4 Ex 244, 154ER1201 116, 229 Ricketts v Erith BC [1943] 2 All ER 629 204, 210 Roe v Minister of Health [1954] 2 QB 66 62, ...
"The starting point for this project on the “Basic Questions of Tort Law” was the book written by Helmut Koziol, the “Basic Questions of Tort Law from a Germanic Perspective”...
533–56 Cane, Peter (2017), Key Ideas in Tort Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing Celli, Umberto (2021), 'Tort Law in Brazil', in Bussani and Sebok 2021, pp. 539–52 Clerk and Lindsell (2020): alternative for Jones, Dugdale and Simpson 2020.
This book takes an original and comparative approach to issues of causation in tort law across many European legal systems.
Recent research in that area suggests that there is a clear difference between Nordic countries, ... and Frank Hendrickx (eds) Labour Law Between Change and Tradition (Kluwer, effective legal remedies between private parties.38 Here, ...
After studying them intensively, Hulsewé concluded that “Han law is the outcome of two streams of thought.” One was “very matter-of-fact ... practical and political, with raison d'etat as its primary motive.
For Justice Dugro, Griffin's race minimized his injury and meant that, even though plaintiff was entitled to a damage award, his injury had less value than if he had been white. At one point, he even noted that Griffin's employer had ...
This book examines the law on compensation for administrative wrongdoing from a comparative law perspective. Particular account is taken of the increasing influence of human rights law, European Community law...
Rustad, Michael (1992), 'In Defense of Punitive Damages in Products Liability', Iowa Law Review, 78, 1–88. Sage, William M. (1988), 'Drug Product Liability and Health Care Delivery Systems', Stanford Law Review, 40, 989–1026.
Footnotes — §15.01: 1 2 FOWLER V. HARPER & FLEMING JAMES, JR., THE LAW OF TORTS, § 26.3 (1956); See W. PAGE KEETON ET AL., PROSSER AND KEETON ON THE LAW OF TORTS, § 69 (5th ed. 1984). 2 See 2 FOWLER V. HARPER & FLEMING JAMES, JR., ...