Obeying Orders: Atrocity, Military Discipline and the Law of War

Description

A soldier obeys illegal orders, thinking them lawful. When should we excuse his misconduct as based in reasonable error? How can courts convincingly convict the soldier's superior officer when, after Nuremberg, criminal orders are expressed through winks and nods, hints and insinuations? Can our notions of the soldier's "due obedience," designed for the Roman legionnaire, be brought into closer harmony with current understandings of military conflict in the contemporary world? Mark J. Osiel answers these questions in light of new learning about atrocity and combat cohesion, as well as changes in warfare and the nature of military conflict. Sources of atrocity are far more varied than current law assumes, and such variations display consistent patterns. The law now generally requires that soldiers resolve all doubts about the legality of a superior's order in favor of obedience. It excuses compliance with an illegal order unless the illegality - as with flagrant atrocities - would be immediately obvious to anyone. But these criteria are often in conflict and at odds with the law's underlying principles and policies. Combat and peace operations now depend more on tactical imagination, self-discipline, and loyalty to immediate comrades than on immediate, unreflective adherence to the letter of superiors' orders, backed by threat of formal punishment. The objective of military law is to encourage deliberative judgment. This can be done, Osiel suggests, in ways that enhance the accountability of our military forces, in both peace operations and more traditional conflicts, while maintaining their effectiveness. Osiel seeks to "civilianize" military law while building on soldiers' own internal ideals of professional virtuousness. He returns to the ancient ideal of martial honor, reinterpreting it in light of new conditions, arguing that it should be implemented through realistic training in which legal counsel plays an enlarged role rather than by threat of legal prosecution. Obeying Orders thus offers a compelling answer to the question that has most haunted the moral imagination of the late twentieth century: the roots - and restraint - of mass atrocity in war.

Get the book

Amazon.com

Search the book

eBay.com

Search the book

Similar books

• 

  Obeying Orders: Atrocity, Military Discipline, and the Law of War

  By Mark Osiel

  Obeying Orders: Atrocity, Military Discipline, and the Law of War

• 

  The Defence of 'Obedience to Superior Orders' in International Law

  By Yoram Dinstein

  compliance with superior orders representing the offence as an act of reprisal ought to be freed from responsibility.273 It is not entirely clear when precisely, according to Lauterpacht and Dunbar, the offender who obeyed an order ...

• 

  Disobey!: A Philosophy of Resistance

  By Frédéric Gros

  To philosophize is to disobey. This book is a call for critical democracy and ethical resistance.

• 

  War and the Politics of Ethics

  By Maja Zehfuss

  When ordered to seize an Iraqi military airfield near Qalat Sukkar, Fick receives this instruction from company headquarters: 'All personnel on the airfield are declared hostile.'192 Fick reflects that they 'normally operated within ...

• 

  Crimes of Obedience: Toward a Social Psychology of Authority and Responsibility

  By V. Lee Hamilton, Herbert C. Kelman

  Sergeant William Calley's defense of his behavior in the My Lai massacre and the widespread public support for his argument that he was merely obeying orders from a superior and was not personally culpable led Herbert C. Kelman and V. Lee ...

• 

  Obedience to Authority

  By Stanley Milgram

  With an introduction from Dr. Philip Zimbardo, who conducted the famous Stanford Prison Experiment, Obedience to Authority is Milgram’s fascinating and troubling chronicle of his classic study and a vivid and persuasive explanation of his ...